public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:58:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_nCZUMSnWYDZ-t+sKCjy7A_P13VMMr+=NxZhAiy9jE2Xg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7ee4f34-6675-4907-4f4e-afc2b94cc2db@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> That's my thinking as well.  If SPI can't be sued, then Gentoo or the top
> people still in and running Gentoo would be sued.

Of course SPI can be sued.  If I want to sue SPI all I need to do is
go down to a courtroom and file some papers and pay a filing fee.
That's what suing somebody is.  Now, if I don't have a reasonable
grounds for the lawsuit it might be quickly dismissed.

Nobody could sue "Gentoo" under the SPI model because "Gentoo" would
not be a legal entity.  They could certainly sue the "top people" in
it, as they can today.

> Let's say a dev did something that caused a lawsuit, say violated a
> copyright or something of that nature.  Why would SPI defend that when SPI
> has no control over what the dev did?

If SPI was named in the lawsuit they would defend themselves.  If they
weren't named in the lawsuit they wouldn't do anything.  If the Gentoo
project (that is, a loose association of Gentoo developers who have no
legal existence) told SPI to pay their legal bills using Gentoo's
money, then they probably would do so.

> The legal council they have seems to be used to keep SPI legal not
> the groups underneath them.

Certainly, but that is all that is needed.

> If a distro, whether it is Debian, Gentoo or
> someone else, violates someone else or breaks the law, they would have to
> defend themselves.

Certainly, though "Debian" is not a legal entity, so it has no need to
defend itself from a lawsuit, because you can't sue "Debian."  Some
individuals associated with Debian could be sued, and they would have
to defend themselves from the lawsuit.  However, they could only be
sued for things they're personally responsible for.

If somebody wanted to sue "Debian" they would probably sue SPI,
because that is who is holding all of Debian's money.  Presumably SPI
operates in such a manner as to make it hard to get it.

-- 
Rich


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-16 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-14 21:43 [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 Andreas K. Huettel
2017-01-14 23:03 ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-14 23:08   ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2017-01-14 23:19     ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-14 23:22       ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2017-01-14 23:25         ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-15 20:26     ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15  1:16   ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-15 20:28     ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 21:00       ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-15 22:23         ` Raymond Jennings
2017-01-16  1:01           ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 14:56             ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 20:31     ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 20:59       ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 14:52         ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 15:06           ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 16:31             ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 16:56               ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 17:35                 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 17:59                   ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:08                     ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 18:23                       ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:10                         ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 18:13                     ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:19                       ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:25                         ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 18:46                           ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:58                             ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2017-01-16 19:13                               ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:46                           ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:52                             ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 19:08                               ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:20                                 ` Dale
2017-01-16 19:34                                   ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 19:54                                     ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:11                                       ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 20:31                                         ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:40                                           ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 20:47                                             ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 20:57                                             ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:27                                       ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 20:38                                         ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:51                                           ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 21:09                                           ` Roy Bamford
2017-01-16 19:31                                 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 19:20                             ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:43                         ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:52                           ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:21                             ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 19:19                         ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 17:50               ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 18:01                 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:02                   ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 18:10                   ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 20:16                     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2017-01-16 20:23                       ` M. J. Everitt
2017-01-16 20:27                         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2017-01-16 20:42                           ` Dale
2017-01-16 21:41                             ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 21:37                       ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 18:40                   ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-16 18:49                     ` Dale
2017-01-15 15:00 ` Roy Bamford
2017-01-15 15:30   ` Rich Freeman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGfcS_nCZUMSnWYDZ-t+sKCjy7A_P13VMMr+=NxZhAiy9jE2Xg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rich0@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox