From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67AAB139085 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29B7321C0B2; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-x244.google.com (mail-yw0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB20421C0B0 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-x244.google.com with SMTP id l75so9393447ywb.3 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:01:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=DCwR7arAlGgdVsJRncy2aEP0crftpGqKqxdWcTpLhGQ=; b=XQUa2aEv4dp4w+9ETo/iOHrxvyRY3s0wb/TEzHDplzhM5JGSrZXuBFFrWNkUC1bBCh FWc3DS8cKT5TXzq0H8FxCCGRx9wiH50I07Z5A3sX1nxUgbFBmp7EvA7cKqHTZVhUdyRj 3QeHJK53BLlmWedfYfCMclEwcEULvd3Lt2H9COEwdRStxYLFjs3MgMdO8zb5IxmX/6UI k6Sx8RuBWvaZIh7yw1gZYFMFRb2ONQQh4dbu1LnX/GvErZ2/eB/WIBe3c2pgMDafdU1B umXfEngzCz0/39GndSIXPQLArPHhDsKMMfsWJePpO7SWIrzXEm0aIq88+tqKp9eziSyd cEXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DCwR7arAlGgdVsJRncy2aEP0crftpGqKqxdWcTpLhGQ=; b=M03e66gCMEAXzLb8kwEUYgQ7z+hFQKFm1RvXjM4gLApICKCXaAZO9BVYvNczbd3UVJ pzgyPWWdUGG86n14PRzL88B/BFq5QU+PbDXh46PU0LX53o1YvXmfSpimUs0RbTvUHqMQ NEscU37HLbz53zPcIVJMt3F6a7Ze8X9KljdWxSXUKVYv0yt21Hz7eyhvuEcVtIeRqHb6 /keMlihBE6eyl2/McKU7Nx6I0H6i+y2cW4j34KWlBtrJSfH/g+HEaClrDQ6QGzP/mfOT yvn6gQd45KlqWrIm2VSvFkoa/MVPGnkw/rODZ49dvAbKgk3FQpkO9osEhi6axr+T84Ri XEMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI17241vr5xx9zp53YtpGHezb6HZo1gkJ0QYhhMonWLf3GlfBVB/8v8rzu79++je6WjxZiNlLh5J/NeSA== X-Received: by 10.55.26.159 with SMTP id l31mr31954368qkh.164.1484589690955; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:01:30 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.16.132 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:01:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1604622.bZRWYHrp25@pinacolada> From: Rich Freeman Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:01:29 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YjeJFGGkXo4aT86axxPVco240YY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: f23af2b6-6336-48b7-8362-efd156b33e71 X-Archives-Hash: 4053c8f18ad5bd21ccef156bf1cae463 On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > > I agree with William here. > > The SPI does not indemnify its associated projects or members. Well, on that I agree with William as well. I never claimed otherwise. > > Its not clear to me how trademark enforcement works, for example. Its > something I am following up on as part of my SPI review (and FAQ) for the > Gentoo Board (and its members, all the stuff will be public.) > Are you doing an SPI review? Based on the fact that none of the Trustees seemed interested in doing one I was actually going to reach out to them myself, but I'd certainly prefer that it come from the Trustees. -- Rich