From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984B313888F for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0333E083C; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f172.google.com (mail-ig0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29329E083A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbdj2 with SMTP id dj2so55128374igb.1 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:52:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=91b+jJRiaq7jTjIP9NjGIFIXHNWnjTb4kYtTog9PBzQ=; b=o1BhLgXuB2WT04xpRMRA0VKJI2FPVMOsOqcac/1xp5J7GhH/AJBlbskoVO2QkZuFtO N6oba+sF41HCQ/l45KMfXtzPtYufs07Doc1F78EvwXpN76IVYTfTN91Wq8g3M/A8jX8n xwKpsfcCgPXX0erRIq+T25Blm3J4It4acsUcf+b+DoWx2wMktBBZeoPs4IXdi64Lun1h PA0KiUlGs8zlJW88+WyJO0PJQDrQC8xGz06x1HloHqTug/8RUOUr0z10TAdFk39JMKhw pyPs/boQlnfyOwelDggZHYq3mVv9btbY/H4CR5+Pydi3HRoAeGssw33jzK4yZVHZ/+3Q bdpg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.29.101 with SMTP id j5mr17362898igh.70.1445863930379; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.118.215 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:52:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <562DDA74.7030800@gentoo.org> References: <562D4269.1030508@gentoo.org> <22061.21589.937200.862099@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <562DDA74.7030800@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 08:52:10 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: g_Fb8td4049CxMr45HxjGbdjhPs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-11-08 From: Rich Freeman To: k_f@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, Gentoo Council Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 25924d51-a049-4bd6-a006-8a064e6bdd1f X-Archives-Hash: 87829a382fa651a3fe8142be979ce535 On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > I haven't read through the references yet, but is it also stated that > eapply_user needs to be applied at least once in addition to being > idempotent? > It says it must be applied once. The reference in this case is just a diff to one line, so you should probably just read it. :) If anybody has additional pros/cons to the idempotent proposal that haven't already been raised I'm all ears. I was against the change but I'm willing to go along with it based on the arguments so far. -- Rich