From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-4955-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1585E58973
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 20:45:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2B2421C04C;
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 20:45:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com [209.85.213.178])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 659CD21C028
for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 20:45:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id rs20so49411534igc.0
for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:45:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type;
bh=eEkwofca3hEhSTywuhHD1iLuQQDVH+Bnaqbmfbi212c=;
b=KFog89PSs7iu9/YjWsmT/ZeB5MpzopxpRZRYkyjQlQAzZXPvv78ThOOECXg9quLwgm
+tsjqn0V5t9xzn1n/ZYIGVembuC7Pw2r1/90kFHlNeA3Bbsohi6gaSMKE2xOKxQ5xL7t
2sXmkeDFXAGhr8CsJoMF7iuCzP94GH3r6PVnqPZw4icMQGhnRC2UiJJpwkiOdKY7axQk
fO8Wyfi8r4GjavBJZYcMDqe0LFUf/8HtuL7OX0G3lwyg1wNGrid0GWo2BOnAC8E4KBoD
/67R+wekn3WC8sWxisKVdzSKWKCnEL4rRQPd2HnLjY/gwT0cC0E0cJ+qrO5Vn+v6+/Io
rTqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=eEkwofca3hEhSTywuhHD1iLuQQDVH+Bnaqbmfbi212c=;
b=ZDqKEz3IjNXMSoIW13iElHE73o188F4W21WETgEI91sy33V7MBz97I9A2j0ebN5DV4
iB969mCwu7/HvBcixCush9Y6IimgcxvGNlHMLL+pKjKL2rkXMXLVwouDCoyYed046+pi
U6E1hjIUXOWbFwZYG9o/x47jd+YQhHsCzR4oSFrDGtz0sw4bnHpMsBHrUOWCnoz1KiXg
Mj2T9HHuGD7z/IzYQYIMEh00IWgGGurEcK7cTTN3eQ8aMjNP5dmHL38aGFD/LPQVlm8n
DVyNa2ipwpQu3LlV4sjoLzu+daEeH8TcKdUsDXLJzeoIrqzuLfWxtcx1IFGkc8fnXvrh
WYyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSOWaTCNrma314stzEYHarIkZJrWo7swQwLLcdzO382QKOqLVc16tty7+Io/IcZldnH2KUYV0EjSHTtmA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.141.226 with SMTP id rr2mr11132793igb.75.1454705128814;
Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:45:28 -0800 (PST)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.225.228 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:45:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20160205192421.37d1565f@snowflex>
References: <562D4269.1030508@gentoo.org>
<56AFB120.3020104@gentoo.org>
<56B322FD.7030602@opensource.dyc.edu>
<20160205192421.37d1565f@snowflex>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:45:28 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: tK9aC0c5LCTZzzGepZuob3BaKOk
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_mVnxopiAccj20R+FpQJCXNTC6588N0H-6SQDBtYfzPEw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for Agenda Items
-- Council Meeting 2016-02-14
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 5110868f-d93e-4786-9945-6098e78938ba
X-Archives-Hash: b121b5e08935060ea3fc35bbf1bd23b4
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
<ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 05:07:57 -0500
> "Anthony G. Basile" <basile@opensource.dyc.edu> wrote:
>> Julian (aka hasufell) indicated to me in a private email that he's not
>> coming back to Gentoo. Of course, we all have these moments when we
>> feel frustrated and have to get away from the madhouse, but if
>> hasufell is serious, we need to do something with his packages.
>
> It's a shame a few poisonous developers have chosen to create such a
> toxic environment for anyone who dares become involved with a different
> package mangler. What can the community do to make sure this doesn't
> happen again?
>
I think I missed something. Are you referring to his interest in
NixOS? I don't think I've seen anything on the lists about that other
than just general interest/etc.
In any case, if anybody is having trouble getting alternative package
managers supported in Gentoo I'm certainly interested. I thought we
put that kind of arguing behind us years ago.
--
Rich