From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF42138A6C for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16469E090E; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F6FFE08F8 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so99456105ied.1 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ak/9h//XbxEZDqNTUm5uwfhPuSifa3bvO1p/eFNAgRU=; b=dY7Sj8YVbqQNeVM3Jm/IT0Rq2paxHh+qzbz7cRDUk9pQkBVswC+N8P2pPs+0JVJFgn XGkyq7oX38cgbqIHj+u4dHgi0hdeZFX+qPI/pBC1n8APIWpAViGBE/JKPXAd8paYJwkW YFA438KFdXqvzFDmObdieFwRoaKs/aJRktrsnhVKaHgmUck8LoNV68ZR90vUOXeh8CwF G2DFPdiJZ7i1NsxS7rqaugjQpwh2KglES20LFXu32jmzuMADaLePzcFQ8WWTybIDoBBa uEf2kkl7m5UPjnIiXd3fw9gcrf3zZycyqN2jSxqE5tTxVSjPoWq7sTtMGF+PlknTdr5P usAg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.29.40 with SMTP id g8mr12688085igh.41.1428537677947; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:01:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.48.198 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:01:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150408224112.GA28020@linux1> References: <1428353540.2041.11.camel@gentoo.org> <55246753.5060902@gentoo.org> <20150408115116.GA6220@linux1> <20150408173901.GA11223@linux1> <20150408224112.GA28020@linux1> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 20:01:17 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZMzAYTtu2xmJHeXYzkgqsj-3phk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Council meeting 2015-04-14: call for agenda items From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, Richard Freeman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 95da8ccb-101b-4634-8397-3f2e85be464b X-Archives-Hash: bd21d1ce471bb7af475078398a5bad75 On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:41 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > 3. Option 1, but don't set the profile status to dev or exp. The > repoman messages that you would get on a stable arch if you do this > might guide you to the remaining packages you need to move back to ~. > As mgorny pointed out, that generates tons of repoman errors and basically blocks anybody from getting anything else done, unless everybody starts ignoring repoman, which isn't what we want. If we're going to let people break the stable depgraph I don't think the profile should be stable. What does a stable profile even mean if we start doing that? -- Rich