public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:34:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_kvKYq3THBcznJ9n6ipE86gfpwO5iWwVQFkMSjfp5CBrA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDOV49shtB_nxqs1L3gVuGhQVbCf7Vtu+4_19w1ERAoTfgo2g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@funtoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> "a situation in which a person is in a position to derive personal
>> benefit from actions or decisions made in their official capacity"
>
> I think the definition in the world of Gentoo would be expanded to cover
> non-financial benefit, since Gentoo is a very egalitarian organization
> (unlike a for-profit company) and there is an expectation of impartiality.

If somebody isn't impartial they shouldn't be involved in either a
Comrel or Council decision.

If they are impartial, then I don't see how the Comrel decision
suddenly makes them not.  Sure, it does make it less likely that an
appeal will be overturned, but that is only a problem if the original
decision was incorrect, and if the decision of the Council is correct
by definition, then having more Council members casting their votes
earlier would tend to impart correctness to the Comrel decision and
not the other way around.

> Also, in very few circumstances are the trustees or council voting on issues
> that even have the potential for financial benefit.

Honestly, this seems like saying that according to the best practices
of most organizations Gentoo doesn't have an issue, therefore we need
to create an issue where no issue would otherwise exist otherwise we
don't have a problem to solve.

> It wouldn't be binding but could be requested, and the council/trustees
> could decide whether the request is legitimate. Again, if there is the
> *perception* of a potential conflict of interest, that can be enough for
> someone to abstain from voting because it strengthens the legitimacy of the
> vote.

In the last year or so it doesn't seem like we've had an issue with
people not being able to voice concerns...  But of course they should
be free to do so.

I just want to be careful because the standard should be what a
reasonable person would perceive, not what somebody who is convinced
that Gentoo is run by the Illuminati would perceive...  :)

IMO it seems like a majority of people voicing opinions here have
non-mainstream opinions on this matter.  I don't think this is
healthy, but ultimately I guess the community gets to decide how much
tinfoil to apply...

-- 
Rich


  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-12 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-11 22:42 [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals William Hubbs
2018-02-11 23:20 ` Rich Freeman
2018-02-12  0:12   ` William Hubbs
2018-02-12  0:29     ` Rich Freeman
2018-02-12  2:16       ` William Hubbs
2018-02-12  2:29         ` Rich Freeman
2018-02-13  2:52           ` Andreas K. Huettel
2018-02-12  8:19 ` Fabian Groffen
2018-02-12  8:58 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-02-12 19:14   ` Michał Górny
2018-02-12 19:36   ` Thomas Deutschmann
2018-02-12 23:02     ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-02-12 23:40       ` M. J. Everitt
2018-02-13  0:13         ` Rich Freeman
2018-02-13  0:16           ` M. J. Everitt
2018-02-13  0:18             ` M. J. Everitt
2018-02-13  0:25           ` Roy Bamford
2018-02-13  1:21             ` Rich Freeman
2018-02-13  0:39   ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2018-02-13  0:57     ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-02-13  4:59     ` Dean Stephens
2018-02-13  5:06       ` M. J. Everitt
     [not found]       ` <f4781100-3fa2-170f-c388-d53f353bf914@gentoo.org>
2018-02-13 20:56         ` [gentoo-dev] " Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
     [not found]         ` <23171.27241.311990.19309@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
2018-02-14  0:33           ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2018-02-12 15:53 ` Daniel Robbins
2018-02-12 16:10   ` Matthew Thode
2018-02-12 16:55   ` William Hubbs
2018-02-12 17:03     ` Daniel Robbins
2018-02-12 17:46       ` Rich Freeman
2018-02-12 17:58         ` Daniel Robbins
2018-02-12 18:34           ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2018-02-12 18:40             ` Daniel Robbins
2018-02-12 18:52               ` Rich Freeman
2018-02-12 19:05                 ` Daniel Robbins
2018-02-12 19:17                   ` Rich Freeman
2018-02-13 13:43                     ` Aaron Bauman
2018-02-13 13:51                       ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2018-02-13 14:41                         ` Aaron Bauman
2018-02-13 14:49                           ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2018-02-13  4:58     ` Dean Stephens
2018-02-13  5:02       ` M. J. Everitt
2018-02-13  5:51         ` Alec Warner
2018-02-13  6:36           ` Robin H. Johnson
2018-02-13 10:23           ` Rich Freeman
2018-02-13 13:59             ` Aaron Bauman
2018-02-13 20:56               ` Rich Freeman
2018-02-13 15:21             ` Alec Warner
2018-02-14  5:15           ` Dean Stephens
     [not found]       ` <a1ec3099-11d7-a779-c9c8-a17bbe1d753e@gentoo.org>
     [not found]         ` <CAGfcS_mZSNTgsRbeGJqmmEkodhK7K73EAx6D4EHMkq1FRw9pRQ@mail.gmail.com>
2018-02-13 21:12           ` [gentoo-dev] " Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2018-02-14  5:16             ` Dean Stephens
2018-02-12 18:54 ` Thomas Deutschmann
2018-02-13  2:43 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2018-02-13  4:09   ` Matthew Thode
2018-02-13 23:21 ` Alexis Ballier
2018-02-14  5:53   ` Michał Górny
2018-02-14  6:01     ` Daniel Robbins
2018-02-14  6:44     ` R0b0t1
2018-02-14  7:22     ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-02-14  7:29       ` Michał Górny
2018-02-14  6:19 ` Mike Gilbert
2018-02-15 20:15 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGfcS_kvKYq3THBcznJ9n6ipE86gfpwO5iWwVQFkMSjfp5CBrA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rich0@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox