From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-3343-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7803F138F88
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:41:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62E95E0A8C;
	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:41:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4678E0A81
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:41:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id id10so658311vcb.27
        for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:41:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=+Z6f0MtcszfXns7vNmRKIjGi+IXwF3u/aUyviP96Am0=;
        b=uYT3IUmKqtSuSAU9FexYBlOiwdqfkpg7UnsSi4QcCvmSox1vhKcAL5FSl7bBTYJ+U9
         +oUqcUyBbQMlte6mWXrT4UcQ3nkP8UDT2iMOAqiF2FS6c6XF7oQC9bsligdAhhok6FLk
         8kneowWMfTvRNOGzHA0J0NtQp2vBX5I67n2NjWzKk/k46Iyw8YowuaXaOY96uU0IS6DR
         Fy7JzkXXPeWJTeULixHZwELIBh9SQslvQfti7qiCmcLB9tSaDw07JzDk322k59TKv5I/
         ON6I2hXZ7s5l1TDaWU0wiNHc+cVFnODfWC7BdTc+JjtSa2K7PQI07aPBtv2G1VhXA8Bg
         FQMg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.77.204 with SMTP id u12mr2279963vew.29.1393591286052;
 Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:41:26 -0800 (PST)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.29.142 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:41:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <531079D9.801@gentoo.org>
References: <530F38CB.4090608@gentoo.org>
	<53106FE4.9080804@gentoo.org>
	<531079D9.801@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:41:25 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: x-Lae56BBrdY4M-vNe2n3rHo7mE
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_kQ-hdOM4H1Wpp6BE0XtMM3PUFLXTFFKVxiUdMhzvut=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 26131788-0818-43e7-93cc-9ae91af3e6d4
X-Archives-Hash: 0c990a7f3604e338a144f880dc831113

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Wow.
> What about ...

This didn't get mentioned in the initial post, but can we get
discussion of individual agenda items in a separate thread?

I suspect that is how the repoman fatal request got missed last time
around - better to just have a "tracker thread" for initial mention of
topics, and move the debate into a separate thread.

That said, please do discuss agenda items - the council shouldn't be
the guys on the mountain who input questions and output seemingly
disconnected answers.

Rich