From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D17B0139085 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0200BE0D3C; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-x241.google.com (mail-qk0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5049E0D3B for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-x241.google.com with SMTP id e1so14576271qkh.1 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 16:55:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=onIiE4PPHapnhPWW0h9T9gbUtzAjetyD0LTLPcoc0rs=; b=AT1tG3OjuKPYCSp1gLwrmn9VhQa65JBDzXF5NgRsQqu4nOf5YZi7wJDI7hvWkqCTfg cuB8WcHjuQcAOrLiWMA9qmPYNOa221QBJ6Td3fi4qGtrp/DhyP4P3V1oMqtpdXrf7ONB GbK8nW2JHd8/MLwKWdT4xBBr7xZ7VIdJLcJLd2OH+FFMHSBKMU0+Sv4LM8dX1Ei6Li4l pXJahmFWjE3pN4F4zUqS3iCwCdRaq71nxiPRjHXsGNiUwGLuFEWF/Z5piVF5FK+x0G+e MHAJ5Eoq0k+o1kTCr5c6tNSZCStkj7Yukl3jeJwAh/xZ9xrwQGqln2a0e2zBn9a1nc1p WUww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=onIiE4PPHapnhPWW0h9T9gbUtzAjetyD0LTLPcoc0rs=; b=IrrgkBqQnItRAN8B9VLAi96lRsJd1fvyOzF5pQEbHf/MkmEJLkQJckj+l6vmZX32R5 Byq45orMpZagnbWbJCXf549xu7FxkGC2R5RM8g+QvxJg7YIp6L479RXjl+l2t/bIzhXH ahzSFFTWwRCufvgiCHQOSvcUrg1R7Zil2Rkbdko/OQ7FTApN70b8eAI0/xmxpYh0WKcQ K9RkbOkNFSnYuWmLDU1K/Eu6h/ln7E1ZHRI0E/wFkYgunFAhfhfEqtsMxv8RBjdkBnwW behgTYNBJdGuk3sYjLliz2fHxZGbtPsyJ7rzAGkestxweAWVCP1qOIFh4ftFUZUEIWYB JlIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIS1f/pM4kynNh4rcZ/IKTLCuRKsqAvVCxsC4RWyRVsXd8c8qBC0/cVi3XRlNQHzB9WaqZrXmFRStRNew== X-Received: by 10.55.101.215 with SMTP id z206mr26869207qkb.35.1484528104884; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 16:55:04 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.16.132 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 16:55:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20170115195209.70d3a748.mgorny@gentoo.org> From: Rich Freeman Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 19:55:04 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lulI7taNKg25aqh2DAppKysH2U0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] ComRel / disciplinary action reform proposal To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 77a0fa08-35e1-45c3-bd90-25728cb08c8e X-Archives-Hash: 4d785f25b8b5f8d167851c6ce9bcc88f On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote: > I would like to suggest that the "defendant" reserves the right to waive his > own rights to privacy if he so desires. > > If he *wants* to publicize his own case, IMHO he should be allowed to do so. > At least from the standpoint of his own privacy, at least. It is, after > all, his reputation. This was the sort of compromise I was thinking of. -- Rich