From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>,
gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org>,
"Gentoo Elections" <elections@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-nfp] Gentoo Foundation: A second election
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:22:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_=g4iSTmeKArKtc0hzoPFv6vwXpV0ujeF8zn=6dfr=g1g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uk0kc2pf2@gentoo.org>
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 10:42 AM Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> If Trustees can fill the vacancies, then there's no point in omitting
> _reopen_nominations. They could still pick any candidates from below.
>
> So, I think the procedure as announced by antarus makes sense.
If the election itself fails to actually elect anybody, they can
actually appoint anybody they wish I believe. (ie, if the reopen
option wins they could just appoint drobbins or a cousin or whatever,
though obviously it would make more sense to just appoint somebody on
the ballot, preferably the one with the most votes.)
They actually can do that right now without another election, though I
do think the course they're taking is a sensible one.
We could spend a lot of time debating the ideal election process, but
in the end if you have only three volunteers for three slots, it is a
bit of a moot argument...
--
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-23 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-23 3:11 [gentoo-project] Gentoo Foundation: A second election Alec Warner
2021-08-23 3:11 ` [gentoo-project] " Alec Warner
2021-08-23 5:26 ` Alice
2021-08-23 6:35 ` [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-nfp] " Michał Górny
2021-08-23 12:00 ` Ulrich Mueller
2021-08-23 12:27 ` Michał Górny
2021-08-23 14:42 ` Ulrich Mueller
2021-08-23 15:22 ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2021-08-23 23:04 ` Alec Warner
2021-08-23 23:19 ` Rich Freeman
2021-08-23 18:09 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2021-08-23 18:17 ` Rich Freeman
2021-08-23 14:20 ` Aaron Bauman
2021-08-23 14:22 ` Rich Freeman
2021-08-23 17:04 ` Ulrich Mueller
2021-08-23 17:06 ` David Seifert
2021-08-23 17:16 ` Michał Górny
2021-08-24 21:11 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2021-08-25 18:05 ` Matt Turner
2021-08-30 4:14 ` Robin H. Johnson
2021-08-30 11:27 ` Roy Bamford
2021-08-30 19:06 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2021-08-30 19:13 ` David Abbott
2021-08-30 19:44 ` Ben Kohler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGfcS_=g4iSTmeKArKtc0hzoPFv6vwXpV0ujeF8zn=6dfr=g1g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rich0@gentoo.org \
--cc=elections@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=mgorny@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox