From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56AF515802F for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86C62E07BA; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:42:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw1-f174.google.com (mail-yw1-f174.google.com [209.85.128.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E277E07BA for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:42:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-5445009c26bso296778577b3.8 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 07:42:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680100928; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vM0Wi4SaKi+ImKFVxA4/OIlXsj1MDDINcBV6AK3kD2A=; b=6JuAlgevnsgC21qEc9Gp696xIdlcJNpwK0CI9UDMneny5bcyyWwIzcEsBgOEp6VXw1 TOT9nA8PMMF2T3ghhO5TGEL1Nh771r37KElFetn/9HMu8Z65rcVcxWgAHjpHF0Il6yyh Yn8jHxcqnDXu0NonB9CBxSQDrkaqAU/LIbbwhS9N341HAsdaOOI389DzX79t+tOgIJS/ o19gYogVhIhzxdWTn6vDcPKtNTavdsgzGtsICqsmDH6oANvExYK9iJp7vJ9ojr2cbJFS 6VtHctfVo6Wgg5uBOD+z1KNAc9j8dQOtAlorzVhx5yphpOuAm2YFYGNyl8oHIaBKXQi/ VfLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9di3jZB9RgFS7RPYVNM4YxwEIuW7fXnOdTc27Mvm/6+yo2xyBXi dZQiO886M6a9aHkIBkzAX8Qw7OEW14bGEc6JENQUembbJmY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350aa9AMSRwHM9sbQm+yl26AkHVCOPP9GMLcuv4ACrGSaMxLSaAuTHSpMFx31WY6Bap240w8QFzpspmsJdV/X4l8= X-Received: by 2002:a81:b647:0:b0:534:d71f:14e6 with SMTP id h7-20020a81b647000000b00534d71f14e6mr9141102ywk.9.1680100928434; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 07:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Rich Freeman Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:41:57 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council Meeting 2023-04-09: Call for Agenda Items To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: John Helmert III , council@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: a2e0f787-30bb-4536-bd1b-c13f4e32a77d X-Archives-Hash: 835f12b160cdc745470db874f638c4b1 On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 1:29=E2=80=AFAM Ulrich Mueller wro= te: > > - Updating GLEP 39 requires an all-developers vote [4] Minor suggestion: the text does not say whether this is a simple majority or something else. It is probably worth a little thought, and making it explicit. I realize this isn't the formal approval of the text, but it might actually be a nice thing for Council to discuss. To toss something out, I'd probably suggest at least a 60% majority of those voting, simply because this is a fairly foundational document and matters with only a slim majority probably should lead to more deliberation. > - Drop hard requirement of yearly lead elections [9] I like the change to it being a recommendation, but I will note that this is actually a pretty decent way to assess project activity. If a project doesn't really have these kinds of discussions then it doesn't seem very project-like. Of course this isn't the only way to measure activity, but it is one of the things that are public-facing since this info is supposed to be on the wiki. --=20 Rich