From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7461381F3 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABB18E0C63; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CE79E0C5D for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:24:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id i3so4084109vbh.12 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 04:24:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=kj+iTa10wkkUmLjCD7Z9jeIopMYmBwMFRbGLrupXJqU=; b=fGxcFi7BfJ4hC5MRnqHrhqCZlIbqj5BooEogSx/r3kGpNEaoGMgne1CA9vjTNScnxX IlsZA7qOg5QtLaRKjUHHLcxGCFJE1hljfIFx+LI2ut5piM0oz28kCtEH7Ui8Lg9XWV0S Me+MwkPJWvif7jbIG1PVR5uuswslyRS9xjOdK0+1UsS8NCjEqdR2kGYcJETrltMvBNhV m81gMoCGzfosvV5yqJuehfDBxlG0I+cyq7ulUVS6RWcpaMw0AE1FNzok8mLcbVkkj30a dlgV4NBb5ZbE90T073KAABflhQWmZIQOpre4xWC8f5jrDpOYf3G+m1nn+u/DzVWQhIFd g7cw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.237.105 with SMTP id vb9mr24920669vec.2.1377689062212; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 04:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.187.68 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 04:24:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <21020.30575.805569.383992@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:24:22 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: tGbn3tH739MRYLvjgWUR-EmX8f4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-09-10 From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: d9ef7cb9-431d-415e-babd-5989f03d8478 X-Archives-Hash: 7b9cd8a72c9b43352efe44f80e711ad2 On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > However, some people raised the point that we should provide stable stages > for these architectures and drop everything else to ~arch. > > So if the Council votes 'NO' to the original question, vote on whether > only @system should > be stable for these architectures. I'd be interested in whether anybody on the arch teams themselves actually supports this proposal. I don't think I actually heard much commentary in that thread one way or another from arch team members, which is as good a reason as any to just completely drop the arch to testing. If some spoke up about being willing to keep up with the @system packages then considering allowing stable keywords for those would make more sense. And yes, I was one of the proponents of the model I tossed out there. A good idea that isn't going to be properly supported isn't a good idea. Rich