From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-6107-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3019139085
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 01:15:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56463E0CCC;
Fri, 6 Jan 2017 01:15:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qt0-x242.google.com (mail-qt0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::242])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F01F3E0C52;
Fri, 6 Jan 2017 01:15:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qt0-x242.google.com with SMTP id f4so1289480qte.2;
Thu, 05 Jan 2017 17:15:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc;
bh=ETUNecF9Ho6uuwzakRifzGkmjC8rXTeiqjURE8L02Yg=;
b=WRTxV0XftEQgP7oUK/0M2MQ2E9jU3dYERp5YZr5wa192usloiF2QeE4nXumJh9aDSm
QHRZ1YU19LjQRKLQov0Bpn+/tFH890xHBBiUfA0R5aegFjIgZ5dEDnbdrj5VL2ZXn6zh
adzoCKWHKjcEdcTtsqKYkIpJCp4KTsVQtcvo5269W4kwjESVekSSkCo9QQPdCn+dx1cw
hQCBDU9Wf98B/UjZt0jYMtAFF9XcwIgxP8MTSStLOmuAxdKHnqyReoy1cYF4Sx/1kUm/
J8SDSkvooX7yiHJlORQsrx3zs8gJHsghA0LXsN7qmDZ1U7vX1SGba64KJ1Bc6wkBQoBr
1zjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=ETUNecF9Ho6uuwzakRifzGkmjC8rXTeiqjURE8L02Yg=;
b=tmCTqZ28N0UtEbo4zY6tkQROssgVnAD/bsFnmjxS0ubJD+jZwVbVvP5sb+VrjLw1fS
bWb8ZG4cyywiN48LK5J6SRbtV890WTfIsPyuRYv3ohyw/tyDnTL8jOHkf/XRyXUngG79
TFAadV2ik7Ea5GDbcKqwdeqjFa/euzVKApDWo1+SKjgRfUKZrCeT/0ILLIwG2d0EfuAl
mnBI/PbM8PgH/1BbwN5ILBYqhEZvjL22Mvr0uLEL0gpwUgauXlKkWS9MHUZucWHeBjVs
UquQ575HTpkPH7cYlH2/I+5DtwRvUs9JIekjorIN4ajVAbb7QOsOwqp3ckp/3+UaDi7R
DjaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIM2Jd5Otm7+uYw12bvErvybu6/ljw761ZEMTi7nnrSGvNwrA3Fm0a8Weq+zH1jCN1PYpFjbl3qJydDNw==
X-Received: by 10.237.53.253 with SMTP id d58mr69634175qte.29.1483665336128;
Thu, 05 Jan 2017 17:15:36 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.34.73 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:15:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAr7Pr-BPxPJ9RSv-ws-_xz=x2=S_b6f5ejT3nDTAbB1uwXyNQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <57d3af79-4212-b8b9-40df-6120b1445c8b@gentoo.org>
<20170105225649.17fc8f79.mgorny@gentoo.org> <CAAr7Pr-BPxPJ9RSv-ws-_xz=x2=S_b6f5ejT3nDTAbB1uwXyNQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 20:15:35 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: PyvpC_KMU2_WF9OiwCPB7U6Aqg8
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_=7akdi+NsVoCQgakcivvozTtFJOwTXH5V25BmoJFDy-A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Merging Trustees and Council / Developers and Foundation
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@gentoo.org>, gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 359551f1-772a-4ede-b581-a3f0924757fc
X-Archives-Hash: f89edb734b88af32a8600a7179980860
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> My general assertion here is that:
>
> 1) If the foundation is prevented legally from accepting a member due to
> their country of origin, its also probable that the foundation is unable to
> accept any contributions from said member for similar reasons.
>
> 2) If the foundation is able to legally accept a member due to their country
> of origin, its probable that the foundation is able to accept their
> contributions.
>
> I suspect that the gap where the foundation cannot legally accept a member,
> but somehow it can accept their contributions) is not noteworthy.
>
I tend to agree. The other good news here is that US embargoes have
been dwindling of late. Iran and Cuba were the really big ones in the
past, and both of those are on their way out. However, this is one of
the downsides to having your sole legal existence in the US. I'm not
sure to what extent having independent orgs in multiple countries
helps here.
--
Rich