From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0EBD1382C5 for ; Wed, 2 May 2018 22:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDC05E088F; Wed, 2 May 2018 22:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot0-x234.google.com (mail-ot0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3511E087A for ; Wed, 2 May 2018 22:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-x234.google.com with SMTP id n1-v6so18429379otf.7 for ; Wed, 02 May 2018 15:02:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2KP22YPNfDLBpiVklO+V+oPB6wi1ZAdrtk7L5rXdxfE=; b=a8p5WNxoPSfdbdlPt0uC070dI20KkhXTx9rv4nk96lHNBD8MxtmqOKvM68TXKzjEvO 8f0qq16I7KMKb5Ma4+xk5eUV9DotpxTW71vF8MxRk+og58k1G303fmE5YK3XigVkQLld o1c6NY+eFOweGlzw9OYoKIGrI0nyhaxyPEmCwuAcDgigmtpzA5Qkr8kHeh3LCZ+KU09q kLri9VF/jpQbovBZPYV1O85TU1DAqbh2BzcUkKHpNRV79VyphMkT2ZRYYq5pha/HGka3 7RwzzFowBvtikNaZ5Da7ooAsrN+z/ri3AGvARpXQLkUbqlguoZl2IZ2j1+F7I6k7wCDy H2HA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2KP22YPNfDLBpiVklO+V+oPB6wi1ZAdrtk7L5rXdxfE=; b=TzUZznyhkb4peYskpyYQWvYLkkH/fzi3LnolEceZMHsSiy/mJNLpeWQpbVPCcl6i2y n81FOjuhMhq2hmSGspoJJpVJrMooyyUD7I6uvmmQbUuiZT0qbQqtdHa0jE1zzqvcVA6w 0vfWZwXfR+WkweguT6EE4jLRkVzs21xlh4MYqptOKdUHP45iwpuN564r3rK0PHPjG7Qb RrXocO2fW6bIjvGtY4V/h2UVG1p0rzvk7ysa5PEGYIAzuU+XhG0RPoa3hmd6+HLcngLy jsjlbY6Eh4xUMloD292X96qvhHMjzznszPnqP/m3TmTnvXytZEQCzuyV4l1w/lgsZ/3N 3S3g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCPlR0oG+YMqZD7GIk696e8UN7/2lVwBsI92JzhSJjcL9Jz4Ahp nx+33rfjjijVxXbLw8kGf0oYka0zhZKNBR+zYHw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqBa8K++cYPU+jJWc2qXIzJJ8Q2ACjEMu9AmAvX9hCnQrer7kMPc6dmp3WBmHtg191WFdQkixnSJGJSQDIg/j4= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3e87:: with SMTP id b7-v6mr15706072otc.194.1525298562331; Wed, 02 May 2018 15:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:5908:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2018 15:02:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20180502201115.22894110@sf> <8ea929a5-88ca-ed26-40eb-69026d0a97ad@gentoo.org> From: Raymond Jennings Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 15:02:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-05-13 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: e8ed647e-fd29-43ff-abec-40ed86722af4 X-Archives-Hash: 376e950797bd64a8022db492074b6d2b On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > On 02/05/2018 23:11, Raymond Jennings wrote: >> My goal is to highlight any possible lack of needed resources in this ar= ea. >> >> I, as a user, have noticed very slow response times on dealing with >> games bugs, and I was curious if added attention would highlight any >> deficiencies. >> >> Also, I was curious if I was the only user having trouble in this area. >> >> I deduced that the audit I mentioned would shed light on the situation. > > Just got a thought: is this type of thing for a Council meeting agenda, > or just something we (you?) could do on the mailing list? I honestly don't know. I guess it could also be said that that itself was one of the questions I could raise on the issue. > Maybe games herd should get added to > . That actually sounds like a good idea. > Would you be interested in contributing some fixes, possibly via the > proxy maintainership? Yes, I am. My status with proxy maintainers is a bit to be desired though (not sure if I should go into anything beyond that) > I'm not sure we need to involve the Council unless there's say pushback > from the games team or any such issue (I believe there was one not that > long ago, although I don't know how much did the situation change for > users and in what direction). Of course decision is not mine, just > wanted to share an opinion. I am aware that a bug was filed against the games group itself in relation to possible defiance of QA rules at one point. I forget how long ago, but I believe it was related to the deprecation of the games eclass. In general: Mostly I was curious if there was in fact a problem, and I figured an audit would shed light on that hypothetical. > Pawe=C5=82 >