public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo as a team effort
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:30:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG2jQ8iRxPMFLfykHM+paViKxb0kB6-yPATn1TN8NPm2gmBkGA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306151350.08725.dilfridge@gentoo.org>

On 15 June 2013 12:50, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Is Gentoo really a loose association of individualists who care about nothing
> but their own stuff, and give a $(/%& about users or the distribution as a
> whole?
>

Gentoo is not a regular distribution. It is a meta-distribution. This
is because of the nature of the packages and the project structure.
What this means is that each project/herd is a well-defined,
independent, sell-contained entity which deals with a subject of
packages. Each project is free to do whatever it wants to do, without
having to justify its actions to anyone. You may complain as much you
want in the mailing list that eg postfix is terribly broken, deviated
from upstream, dev FooBar is non-cooperative, etc etc but in practice
nobody (except the net-mail members) can do anything to help you.
So yes, individual developers/project can do whatever. They may please
the users or they many not. Sad? yes. True? yes

The Council is supposed to somehow control inter-project
communications when the developers fail to do so, but this rarely
happens.

I suggest to take that into consideration during the upcoming Council
elections. If you don't like the current situation, be part of the
decision making. Yet another recycled thread in the mailing list will
certainly not help.

--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-15 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-15 11:50 [gentoo-project] Gentoo as a team effort Andreas K. Huettel
2013-06-15 11:54 ` Fabian Groffen
2013-06-15 12:15   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-06-15 21:43     ` Michael Weber
2013-06-16  4:20     ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2013-06-16  6:31     ` Sergey Popov
2013-06-16  9:33       ` Douglas Dunn
2013-06-15 12:08 ` Rich Freeman
2013-06-15 12:42   ` Johannes Huber
2013-06-15 13:44     ` Tom Wijsman
2013-06-15 14:19       ` Johannes Huber
2013-06-15 16:08         ` Tom Wijsman
2013-06-15 13:30 ` Markos Chandras [this message]
2013-06-15 16:08   ` Roy Bamford
2013-06-15 20:00     ` William Hubbs
2013-06-15 20:14       ` Rich Freeman
2013-06-17 16:15 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-06-17 17:02   ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-06-17 18:24     ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAG2jQ8iRxPMFLfykHM+paViKxb0kB6-yPATn1TN8NPm2gmBkGA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hwoarang@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox