From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-8314-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A496138334
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 04:40:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8657E086F;
	Sun, 16 Dec 2018 04:40:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78054E0866
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 04:40:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-it1-f175.google.com (mail-it1-f175.google.com [209.85.166.175])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93D50335C36
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 04:40:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-it1-f175.google.com with SMTP id h193so15410420ita.5
        for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 20:40:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZ9eGH7FVrQldzwznxaiXqDTPOBfr37hbdnKNJKCotgdkKn6hCS
	nIwm7hVBAraFwtfe/sDDEIbHmWf1mHlZ95+1x1w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VS4Hum0nuUqA6CRpSQjyYwi3SHGwbA1I78kSaVckpNTioMAaWGRgNVxhC8BDvCo//rA2Nrz8X99SqVdzlvDF8=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:9804:: with SMTP id t4mr7653000jaj.68.1544935250530;
 Sat, 15 Dec 2018 20:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAr7Pr-5+tXtvfD1i_8YtUiWDu7FeUYrVgdWJyHzj8JQfeJNng@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAr7Pr-5+tXtvfD1i_8YtUiWDu7FeUYrVgdWJyHzj8JQfeJNng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 23:40:38 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAEdQ38H=7bFuYetYQde6e3YLfbc+2G_gNSBme6v3ekrPZVbE5g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38H=7bFuYetYQde6e3YLfbc+2G_gNSBme6v3ekrPZVbE5g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] RFC: Dropping rsync as a tree distribution method
To: Gentoo project list <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Archives-Salt: a8287009-dc4d-4ceb-b676-37514c715597
X-Archives-Hash: 357fd450751706844907aa62d5690b14

On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:16 PM Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
> - Disk usage for git vs rsync

This is why I have not switched. With git you pull down increasing
amounts of history, whereas with rsync the data fits easily in a <1GB
partition.