From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-2875-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970CF1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24ED4E09F1;
	Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 883DAE09DD
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:15:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D0E733E121
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:15:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id o19so2456128qap.13
        for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=7rdhm11xkPT8vzBXY/iwRnbuLm9T3B7QWpdVbjjsF6Y=;
        b=d5e/BJ6XwLxW5QhVas7z/SLZkMkViJOKTbFGfg6oJSR8oT4+Tr9Yw9aLnu5HXv4IBj
         Brks7agk/B9plTE/nAaOErYm+zxstoKNpCIVpdL0ptdvJ44mZjCFSDt/CpP/AhWPqwRN
         0blUV3W83DDV0h0kxpebodF9AeSlRmsSpB7qn1OlrLiWQ3fetZsw4hBmSbdkQupgNa0t
         lOSvp69FPw3eg4VTymR36NsXbRHz/QrLcaK1qoaVY0brk8XetbHQvr+2Ln9uvZ7sngDz
         smzOJVRm9qBjeHzeA3uJnVbzE+hmvp6OUb1/E2uVSZGRyf5VhZo1NZWYFcZQKL5IoP+u
         stBA==
X-Received: by 10.224.167.141 with SMTP id q13mr44150019qay.31.1375200927439;
 Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.108.6 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51F7DB94.4000200@gentoo.org>
References: <51F16EF7.30606@gentoo.org> <20130730150840.GD14765@comet.hsd1.mn.comcast.net>
 <51F7DB94.4000200@gentoo.org>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:15:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38Gtwh2b8nhg9OYWKY9gvNnA=4_cx-vLZ6DNygEt2LeGvg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] changing the default of ACCEPT_LICENSE in portage
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 4fda9e98-b313-4497-bd37-2b1ed5003ab5
X-Archives-Hash: 384bd69296a70e47818e2b07e2afc134

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:28 AM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 07/30/2013 05:08 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> I don't see any conflict between requiring that our system packages be
>> free software and providing the pragmatic experience that we also
>> promise to our users in our philosophy:
>
> I don't see any conflict between requiring the user to accept unfree
> licenses explicitly and our philosophy.
> In fact, we are already forcing interaction with that variable via "-@EULA".

... I think Donnie's agreeing with you.