From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-4496-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24305138A6C
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed,  8 Apr 2015 00:02:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36070E086E;
	Wed,  8 Apr 2015 00:02:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DB09E084C
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  8 Apr 2015 00:02:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75A0034091A
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  8 Apr 2015 00:02:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbeb7 with SMTP id eb7so41338488obb.3
        for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.60.155.135 with SMTP id vw7mr28516191oeb.62.1428451334132;
 Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.189.195 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 17:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_mXkkrKnB1ap-8wFv4jMeLVLmXiOxEhAtCk8cxZzdg1Fw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150402141428.GA31638@oregano.home.lan> <mfmpto$cis$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <CAGfcS_noUvSEcE2B9VnofS2rC0oL7WkUFk1KMYe40-_tu+trqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <201504032214.01310.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <mfosjp$17v$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <CAGfcS_=+emORt-zvLjX2vg5b6nJ0f_nnEYM20C=bB7=uL+jZ4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150404220205.GA415@linux1> <1428237147.22472.1.camel@gentoo.org>
 <20150405195044.GA2917@linux1> <20150406002706.4aff7e4dda27a25a5c106b50@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_=jmcpD9+Dr5iPxxaCwhwJTPkrsW1xnKRVPLYMt48WVMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5521BF9C.5060809@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_k=6X-zc-koYZ4dmjkajZZLZt+3-n3n9Vv_4UUbNMwHsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1428353540.2041.11.camel@gentoo.org> <CAEdQ38E1qaw61TOhvuPHYKmjSnY9g0UFqPSDKBRKtBOa-2_v2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGfcS_mXkkrKnB1ap-8wFv4jMeLVLmXiOxEhAtCk8cxZzdg1Fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 17:01:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38GhJ9TeKWfb0fX5zMTNj4Q5nuexu1zE3V9Y82Rrb8m9=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Council meeting 2015-04-14: call for agenda items
To: Gentoo project list <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 8f30dd96-77b9-4090-b691-3c49e8369153
X-Archives-Hash: 8ba2dfaf70e60f75a7722be8e08b4b99

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> I've wanted for a long time a system that can help reduce the time I
>> have to sit in front of a computer waiting for things to finish
>> compiling before I can test them. Trawl bugzilla, grab package lists,
>> go build binpkgs. Just let me grab binpkgs and actually test the
>> software...
>
> I approve, and I'm sure the rest of the Council will too.  When will
> you have it ready?

I don't think it's some pie-in-the-sky fantasy that you can quip "when
will you have it ready?" about.

Isn't, in fact, this something like what Zorry is working on? He
mentioned in 10 days ago in "[gentoo-dev] Cluster tinderbox poc"

I'm lamenting the fact that ~30 emails in no one has even appeared to
wonder out loud if there's actually a technical solution to the
problem. Instead we're debating the merits of unkeywording whole
subtrees.