From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SYOAx-0006FF-0Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 21:05:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C9EBE0764 for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 21:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83762E0495 for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 19:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8EE1B4004 for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 19:03:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.373 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.373 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.228, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HferHx3mqUJc for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 19:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f177.google.com (mail-qc0-f177.google.com [209.85.216.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 682B11B4007 for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 19:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsu28 with SMTP id u28so1225594qcs.36 for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 12:03:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=UIpMGJ2DA4VxEUT5FsPr1T3a4Bpf5I89iiSp71voISw=; b=o1zW7zT6XYQ8R8HzTfX4A25TnszN57i7RXRdEDd3wKck/TUH2ZIA1jky7c1gYgkacA 7O++3oGftZdCpTjZUVAOAiDGa9gCU19w6LkxfW1Yfd1uqwzK8swZuhtJaaItnhtmfXHq c5Rm7R5xLy76D5BiG6W/tvPav5rYnuruLYBZZnVYzCVhQfHAz1kcfZ3vUKL8IPy1LCEr W9PeLH/xnebhVqVidX6ueWbhN/pFRmgOvD9J4sAyosk8yxSqZ/wfEDW/fDVIQ6WuUnSE xgah8xMD6x/szZsoD3Q+0ANMfHoK1pIkQb/9ZnuApc8s8EQf2OTZs7n5cDURAO3we5W2 9EOA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.44.68 with SMTP id z4mr3243500qae.38.1338059018926; Sat, 26 May 2012 12:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: matthew.summers@liquidustech.com Received: by 10.229.91.77 with HTTP; Sat, 26 May 2012 12:03:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120526184732.GA4011@gentoo.org> References: <20120526184732.GA4011@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 14:03:38 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -j8TWV95zIFtuXGbXu49wREm-rw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Use of git for site/proj/docs From: Matthew Summers To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnZWenFc4gPIY8HT2ncPO2N/4YHMhX13cDvK2Jsr6U+8qUlkknlOhABkwpSH12c0wL0G8YV X-Archives-Salt: dbb9ca4b-bf10-4446-ae62-3da6a617b167 X-Archives-Hash: b5a8ac95b1a5ba46f8c03cb41e56b461 On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > Hi guys, > > The gentoo CVS repository currently contains the sources for (at least) t= he > following things: > > - the main gentoo site (through gentoo/xml/htdocs/main) > - the gentoo documentation (gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc) > - the gentoo project sites (gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj) > > A long time ago, there was talk about migrating it to git. From what I he= ard > from Matthew, one of the things that might be interfering with this proce= ss > is that the current gentoo/xml repository is too large, is that correct? > > I don't mind helping along here to get things forward. > > Wkr, > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Sven Vermeulen > It is not the size that matters, but the layout of the resulting repo or repos. I know the Foundation has discussed having it's own repo. There is also the news/gmn/gwn dir and so on. How should these resultant repos be structured? Are we in a position to retire some of the dirs in gentoo/ ? --=20 Matthew W. Summers Gentoo Foundation Inc. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SYOAb-0006BV-6I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 21:05:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8186E0777 for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 21:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com (mail-qa0-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860E6E0486 for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 19:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qabj34 with SMTP id j34so337382qab.11 for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 12:03:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=UIpMGJ2DA4VxEUT5FsPr1T3a4Bpf5I89iiSp71voISw=; b=R2XetUSRFcpoJqhtasXVrJp1oIKxO3oP/w4UnTcNcr0C94LXC+rptOmSPMwCCHxfHm lxX6k0ynH+cKks6mkaIxy1Raog7iB75Avk2KhNxCxxe2rwefHdMwDmDZWok7pDV81RRa OstyAx3ZmFQL4FTfeqRc/o56A0eYH7YZnxP44BZTppF3AETOCeoCOTRL0UL1smqbGnFx JzvP1SbAPO9wG+AGMc+hUh61dLy7y9Byj4CsjLAKJYetTDZHgOXqEjXn2cErKuZntJn5 BYjR6IyicaylDX9POWxyikEBGnCBtvNxwsyFnUQUBaPHWOLcboaieBKUtwj90BfX6la4 Z1VQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.44.68 with SMTP id z4mr3243500qae.38.1338059018926; Sat, 26 May 2012 12:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: matthew.summers@liquidustech.com Received: by 10.229.91.77 with HTTP; Sat, 26 May 2012 12:03:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120526184732.GA4011@gentoo.org> References: <20120526184732.GA4011@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 14:03:38 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -j8TWV95zIFtuXGbXu49wREm-rw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Use of git for site/proj/docs From: Matthew Summers To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-project@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmHBgb1qX0OrR/8sk9KoTAbMXdFX1clA4cKtA2qTklm8MRdSNKE+/v5On11vAZBwpp8Hxs1 X-Archives-Salt: 2d381bbc-b00b-4ce9-9573-2bdbefa5d901 X-Archives-Hash: aaa1131df1d31ff6156d2e080ca8fc07 Message-ID: <20120526190338.a7LDmtIP5uC2QmRHMhwPHGMWVesk8Ad34sqrYz9W-Io@z> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > Hi guys, > > The gentoo CVS repository currently contains the sources for (at least) t= he > following things: > > - the main gentoo site (through gentoo/xml/htdocs/main) > - the gentoo documentation (gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc) > - the gentoo project sites (gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj) > > A long time ago, there was talk about migrating it to git. From what I he= ard > from Matthew, one of the things that might be interfering with this proce= ss > is that the current gentoo/xml repository is too large, is that correct? > > I don't mind helping along here to get things forward. > > Wkr, > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Sven Vermeulen > It is not the size that matters, but the layout of the resulting repo or repos. I know the Foundation has discussed having it's own repo. There is also the news/gmn/gwn dir and so on. How should these resultant repos be structured? Are we in a position to retire some of the dirs in gentoo/ ? --=20 Matthew W. Summers Gentoo Foundation Inc.