From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org>,
gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Gentoo Elections <elections@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-nfp] Gentoo Foundation: A second election
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:09:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvE9N=pP_w9ANhMKtDei8ikY2hFjHE26Nb+TfmFx5vyVQ16ig@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uk0kc2pf2@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1431 bytes --]
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:42 PM Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 14:00 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
<snip>
> >> For reference, the procedure for Council elections is this [1]:
> >>
> >> If the pseudo-candidate '_reopen_nominations' appears in 7th place
> >> or higher those candidates that rank above '_reopen_nominations'
> >> will be the current council. A second period of nominations will
> >> be opened for the remaining council seats. No third period of
> >> nominations will be opened in the event '_repoen_nominations'
> >> ranks higher than the candidates necessary to fill the council.
>
> > Honestly, this seems unclear to me. Does that mean that Council will
> > have less members than 7?
>
> Yes, this is how I would read it, and I think the full log of the
> meeting fully clarifies that this was the intention.
>
>
This is what was approved "back then". The intention was to leave those
candidates that ranked below _reopen_nominations out of the Council, even
if that caused the Council to have less than 7 members.
The 2nd election period was meant to provide an opportunity for new
candidates to come forward or for the electorate to rethink their vote.
AFAIK, the Trustees have always argued that we should not reduce the number
of members in the Board.
Regards,
Jorge
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2221 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-23 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-23 3:11 [gentoo-project] Gentoo Foundation: A second election Alec Warner
2021-08-23 3:11 ` [gentoo-project] " Alec Warner
2021-08-23 5:26 ` Alice
2021-08-23 6:35 ` [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-nfp] " Michał Górny
2021-08-23 12:00 ` Ulrich Mueller
2021-08-23 12:27 ` Michał Górny
2021-08-23 14:42 ` Ulrich Mueller
2021-08-23 15:22 ` Rich Freeman
2021-08-23 23:04 ` Alec Warner
2021-08-23 23:19 ` Rich Freeman
2021-08-23 18:09 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto [this message]
2021-08-23 18:17 ` Rich Freeman
2021-08-23 14:20 ` Aaron Bauman
2021-08-23 14:22 ` Rich Freeman
2021-08-23 17:04 ` Ulrich Mueller
2021-08-23 17:06 ` David Seifert
2021-08-23 17:16 ` Michał Górny
2021-08-24 21:11 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2021-08-25 18:05 ` Matt Turner
2021-08-30 4:14 ` Robin H. Johnson
2021-08-30 11:27 ` Roy Bamford
2021-08-30 19:06 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2021-08-30 19:13 ` David Abbott
2021-08-30 19:44 ` Ben Kohler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADvE9N=pP_w9ANhMKtDei8ikY2hFjHE26Nb+TfmFx5vyVQ16ig@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jmbsvicetto@gentoo.org \
--cc=elections@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox