[gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Matthew Summers]

Hi!

Due to a fortunate and unexpected sequence of events, gentoo now has
an organizational github account.

I pose this question to you, the readers: What do you think we should
do with this?

Thanks!
Matt

-- 
Matthew W. Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Pandu Poluan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 350 bytes --]

On May 19, 2012 4:14 AM, "Matthew Summers" <quantumsummers@gentoo.org>
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Due to a fortunate and unexpected sequence of events, gentoo now has
> an organizational github account.
>
> I pose this question to you, the readers: What do you think we should
> do with this?
>
> Thanks!
> Matt
>

Hmmm... make a portage tree mirror?

Rgds,

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 527 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Nirbheek Chauhan]

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
> On May 19, 2012 4:14 AM, "Matthew Summers" <quantumsummers@gentoo.org>
> Hmmm... make a portage tree mirror?
>

We don't even use git in our workflow, so I see no point in setting up
a github repo.

--
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Matthew Summers]

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
>> On May 19, 2012 4:14 AM, "Matthew Summers" <quantumsummers@gentoo.org>
>> Hmmm... make a portage tree mirror?
>>
>
> We don't even use git in our workflow, so I see no point in setting up
> a github repo.
>
> --
> ~Nirbheek Chauhan
>
> Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
>

How about this? Mirror overlays for projects that are understaffed to
encourage more broad contribution from the community. Thoughts?

-- 
Matthew W. Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.

[gentoo-project] Re: Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Steven J Long]

Matthew Summers wrote:
> How about this? Mirror overlays for projects that are understaffed to
> encourage more broad contribution from the community. Thoughts?
> 
Sounds like a great idea. After all, it'll just bitrot otherwise.

-- 
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-)

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Ultrabug]

On 19/05/2012 16:58, Matthew Summers wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
>>> On May 19, 2012 4:14 AM, "Matthew Summers" <quantumsummers@gentoo.org>
>>> Hmmm... make a portage tree mirror?
>>>
>>
>> We don't even use git in our workflow, so I see no point in setting up
>> a github repo.
>>
>> --
>> ~Nirbheek Chauhan
>>
>> Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
>>
> 
> How about this? Mirror overlays for projects that are understaffed to
> encourage more broad contribution from the community. Thoughts?
> 

It also may be interesting to use the github workflow with
proxy-maintainers (which might also make the proxy-maintainers project
even more visible) ?

Seems like quite a bunch of people and potential contributors are used
to github so we might be able to capitalize on it.

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Aaron W. Swenson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/21/2012 07:58 AM, Ultrabug wrote:
> On 19/05/2012 16:58, Matthew Summers wrote:
>> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan
>> <nirbheek@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Pandu Poluan
>>> <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
>>>> On May 19, 2012 4:14 AM, "Matthew Summers"
>>>> <quantumsummers@gentoo.org> Hmmm... make a portage tree
>>>> mirror?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> We don't even use git in our workflow, so I see no point in
>>> setting up a github repo.
>>> 
>>> -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan
>>> 
>>> Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
>>> 
>> 
>> How about this? Mirror overlays for projects that are
>> understaffed to encourage more broad contribution from the
>> community. Thoughts?
>> 
> 
> It also may be interesting to use the github workflow with 
> proxy-maintainers (which might also make the proxy-maintainers
> project even more visible) ?
> 
> Seems like quite a bunch of people and potential contributors are
> used to github so we might be able to capitalize on it.
> 

It may even increase the collaboration between individual software
organizations as well. I know some do make their own Gentoo ebuilds,
but then never get passed along to us or become outdated because the
one developer who made it no longer works with that project or has
lost interest or....
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk+6RkoACgkQVxOqA9G7/aDTjAD/ajKisXJWNa5f7tquLvRCm0Zh
3ANcNVzATzIUYOoXgWcA/RDbgpl4iolA/ZauFAqvjTCjFTWvzzGol3l52arqMcYx
=M7GL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Rich Freeman]

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Ultrabug <ultrabug@gentoo.org> wrote:
> It also may be interesting to use the github workflow with
> proxy-maintainers (which might also make the proxy-maintainers project
> even more visible) ?
>

Tend to agree, although a big liability will be the fact that we're
still not on git ourselves.  So, to be useful that github tree would
to get regular cvs updates incorporated, and then any content would
need to be manually moved over.  The trees would be constantly
slightly out of sync - what happens if somebody commits a fix without
a revbump to git and then the cvs tree refreshes git not showing the
change, and so on?

I guess for proxy-maintained packages we could just consider the
git-tree "official" and do all forward work there without publishing
cvs changes automatically.  Then cvs updates are just manual copies
when things are good in the git tree.  However, the second somebody
comes along with some library package move or other tree-wide change
they're going to make things out of sync unless they know to go update
git.

Seems like overlays are the best candidate for a place to start since
they largely use git already.  Maybe this is just one more reason to
get the main tree onto git as well...

Rich

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Dan Douglas]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1736 bytes --]

On Monday, May 21, 2012 11:00:17 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Ultrabug <ultrabug@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > It also may be interesting to use the github workflow with
> > proxy-maintainers (which might also make the proxy-maintainers project
> > even more visible) ?
> 
> Tend to agree, although a big liability will be the fact that we're
> still not on git ourselves.  So, to be useful that github tree would
> to get regular cvs updates incorporated, and then any content would
> need to be manually moved over.  The trees would be constantly
> slightly out of sync - what happens if somebody commits a fix without
> a revbump to git and then the cvs tree refreshes git not showing the
> change, and so on?
> 
> I guess for proxy-maintained packages we could just consider the
> git-tree "official" and do all forward work there without publishing
> cvs changes automatically.  Then cvs updates are just manual copies
> when things are good in the git tree.  However, the second somebody
> comes along with some library package move or other tree-wide change
> they're going to make things out of sync unless they know to go update
> git.
> 
> Seems like overlays are the best candidate for a place to start since
> they largely use git already.  Maybe this is just one more reason to
> get the main tree onto git as well...
> 
> Rich

Managing more than a few eclass/builds fromthe main tree while watching 
upstream (Gentoo) for conflicts is a very difficult workflow. For those projects 
already using git like Kde and Haskell it's at least helpful to be able to 
look at logs and do diffs on my own machine. Users get much more out of having 
git available than those with commit access.

-- 
Dan Douglas

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Markos Chandras]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 05/21/2012 04:00 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Ultrabug <ultrabug@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>> It also may be interesting to use the github workflow with 
>> proxy-maintainers (which might also make the proxy-maintainers
>> project even more visible) ?
>> 
> 
> Tend to agree, although a big liability will be the fact that
> we're still not on git ourselves.  So, to be useful that github
> tree would to get regular cvs updates incorporated, and then any
> content would need to be manually moved over.  The trees would be
> constantly slightly out of sync - what happens if somebody commits
> a fix without a revbump to git and then the cvs tree refreshes git
> not showing the change, and so on?
> 
> I guess for proxy-maintained packages we could just consider the 
> git-tree "official" and do all forward work there without
> publishing cvs changes automatically.  Then cvs updates are just
> manual copies when things are good in the git tree.  However, the
> second somebody comes along with some library package move or other
> tree-wide change they're going to make things out of sync unless
> they know to go update git.
> 
> Seems like overlays are the best candidate for a place to start
> since they largely use git already.  Maybe this is just one more
> reason to get the main tree onto git as well...
> 
> Rich
> 
It will be a pain from our (proxy-maint) side to use git workflow on a
cvs tree. Speaking of myself I am not interested in supporting this
"mixed" kind of collaboration and frankly I see no viable way for
someone to do that in the long term.

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPunj5AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCN4cP/ipXJI7V0Tpoirtl66gEEPun
RMjTrkNqsOPjyliQX/AfjSVpDlXCFwImciakVngfy6CQ1A2635VJHcjhSRSfnsKX
BsBmD19ZIRXpLI7KZYzn9JkRMYQaiEwVTQUdtNpFrQ5r62lrbkJOBypXJZGdA9/a
l/aw6dTCjb2yXhV6ToRtHXTB396eY6rJuCb/RpDNz557jQ/BOV1HrhDFhhtUZD9h
GDOdrGmK0dWYoKVU8LN++k6/AU1MTx9YQ9nXXz0m4YbH021Z4BazcPUuCjN3Y4ZZ
UblKg1bkwgZXQ7GB2tfk8LQPOTji8EWi36BNNjXpg5uYCMsmfGTdQNS3TlLjVLRN
uQXiI7nfDxB9fwWRiNHrv+3Xxj0VKXpNRrT8qiEpUHSmiuurQ29DSPRDh7+dO3I6
4DpjoJRyNAbR915pdNy+TdwXhDr7gAPPXiamCHNzKYFcVe86HV335GEGTRHrK442
TTsjV/FwuvkFhR1ehU5Co7mrDxmTyDVKkbB6wFnA2lGIaQ/9Sw083AbUYH6uH8+M
fcjwjczSAgjvrZzjXA78srdKomD/m+Bw0bUyNKc/dIRrDIiTvLZ3pwI/DCKaeM08
aM1KxG/B1XF6AUAsOzD98bEyq5LeXTrQSaXSEUwQc6VpLztrQsIMjMuQLOtwYRDI
x8+/ZVsA+y3wKA8K28c9
=SWQu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Matthew Summers]

So, to summarize so far:

1. Mirroring overlays seems like it is a good idea or at least ok.

2. The portage tree is not ready to be mirrored and attempting a git
workflow will be painful at the moment. It's assumed, however, that
once portage is git-managed these troubles will disappear.

What else folks?

What about mirroring the docs repo? I think its git-managed now or
will be soon. What other repos would benefit from this?

-- 
Matthew W. Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Aaron W. Swenson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/21/2012 04:35 PM, Matthew Summers wrote:
> So, to summarize so far: ... 2. The portage tree is not ready to be
> mirrored and attempting a git workflow will be painful at the
> moment. It's assumed, however, that once portage is git-managed
> these troubles will disappear.

I don't understand how this would be painful. In my mind:

 $ cp ~/github/collab/cat/pkgfile.ebuild ~/gentoo/gentoo-x86/cat/pkg/
 $ cd ~/github/collab/cat/pkg
 $ # Follow normal commit steps here.

- - Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk+7m0MACgkQVxOqA9G7/aAA9wEAhWkw41FnJYsaGK0SE5TyABcE
UrOMRuKoU9jvneN5mB8BAJrNeXNhqNFSW84HKQ+YbOyyiCwl4mEdIoHYwXzP50Np
=ir2O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Rich Freeman]

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Aaron W. Swenson <titanofold@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I don't understand how this would be painful. In my mind:
>
>  $ cp ~/github/collab/cat/pkgfile.ebuild ~/gentoo/gentoo-x86/cat/pkg/
>  $ cd ~/github/collab/cat/pkg
>  $ # Follow normal commit steps here.

Then realize that you just committed an ebuild that lacks some fix the
foo.eclass team quietly made to the previous ebuild when making some
tree-wide tweak.

In maintaining the mythtv ebuilds one of the things I've noticed is
that it is not always easy to keep tree ebuilds in sync with an
external overlay, because people do stuff to the tree all the time
without involving the maintainers.  Usually these are relatively small
changes that are good from a quality perspective (often related to
dependencies/etc), or just stuff like package moves/virtuals/etc, but
the bottom line is that if you just merge some change from an overlay
without doing some checks you can end up with a regression.

So, if people are going to submit patches to help out it is best that
those patches be against what is actually in portage and not some
slowly diverging repository.  The only way to really address this is
to somehow apply changes automatically back into the overlay, but that
has issues as well.

In a git-based world with easy branching/etc this would likely be less
of a problem...

Rich

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Alexey Shvetsov]

Hi all!

Can someone add my github acc to gentoo organization? =D
-- 
Best Regards,
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, NRC Kurchatov Institute, 
Gatchina, Russia
Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
Gentoo Team Ru
Gentoo Linux Dev
mailto:alexxyum@gmail.com
mailto:alexxy@gentoo.org
mailto:alexxy@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Matthew Summers]

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Can someone add my github acc to gentoo organization? =D
> --
> Best Regards,
> Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
> Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, NRC Kurchatov Institute, Gatchina,
> Russia
> Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
> Gentoo Team Ru
> Gentoo Linux Dev
> mailto:alexxyum@gmail.com
> mailto:alexxy@gentoo.org
> mailto:alexxy@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru
>

You should be a member now.

-- 
Matthew W. Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Matthew Summers]

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Matthew Summers
<quantumsummers@gentoo.org> wrote:
> So, to summarize so far:
>
> 1. Mirroring overlays seems like it is a good idea or at least ok.
>
> 2. The portage tree is not ready to be mirrored and attempting a git
> workflow will be painful at the moment. It's assumed, however, that
> once portage is git-managed these troubles will disappear.
>
> What else folks?
>
> What about mirroring the docs repo? I think its git-managed now or
> will be soon. What other repos would benefit from this?
>
> --
> Matthew W. Summers
> Gentoo Foundation Inc.

Just to add to this, we have some gentoo.github.com to link interested
parties to gentoo.org et. at.

Please feel free to give ideas for this
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo.github.com viewable at
http://gentoo.github.com

What should we do here, anything? For simplicity I just used what I
did for http://get.gentoo.org
-- 
Matthew W. Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Ben de Groot]

Can you add me as a member?

-- 
Cheers,

Ben | yngwin
Gentoo developer
Gentoo Qt project lead

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Matthew Summers]

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Can you add me as a member?
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Ben | yngwin
> Gentoo developer
> Gentoo Qt project lead
>

Yes I can, and I have.

-- 
Matthew W. Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Aaron W. Swenson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/27/2012 11:18 AM, Matthew Summers wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>> Can you add me as a member?
>> 
>> -- Cheers,
>> 
>> Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead
>> 
> 
> Yes I can, and I have.
> 
And me, please. (titanofold on github.)

- - Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk/CU+sACgkQVxOqA9G7/aA4PgD/ehEQNh0YwFfhdPBfV4OIyajS
/WAIsYdN4Y7F8ArjJc8A/jA8kWXIxeXuzmcK/+RwpPj/SjD8k4tM9ery5yQy8yS5
=ESZM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Rich Freeman]

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Aaron W. Swenson
<titanofold@gentoo.org> wrote:
> And me, please. (titanofold on github.)
>

Might I suggest that somebody who is interested volunteer to organize
a github project of some sort (short-lived or otherwise), have
everybody just reach out to them, maybe have a meeting or two on IRC,
and then systematically coordinate what happens with our repository
there and work out access with infra?

The alternative seems to be some combination of everybody wondering
what it is for, and a bazillion one-off access requests on -project,
just so that everybody's name can appear on the member list.

I don't want to suggest that nobody do anything until we have a huge
formal process that will never happen.  I just want to suggest that if
somebody is really interested in our github presence that they just
step up and proclaim themselves the github lead and start soliciting
volunteers to help.  If we get more than one then they can work it out
amongst themselves, or worst case have a quick poll on IRC.  That's
generally how Gentoo projects work.  I'd rather see a benevolent
dictator actually make something happen than lots of people just
waiting for something to happen on its own.  Said dictator should try
to be inclusive, of course.

Matt - if you're interested in taking on this role by all means feel
free, but I imagine you're pretty busy as it is.  I know you were kind
of thrust into it de-facto.

My only suggestion is to try to organize things such that there is
room for many different uses.  I'd carve out a place to put a future
gentoo-x86 git clone, overlays (both project and personal), sources
for other gentoo projects, and so on.  I've been maintaining
cfg-update in my own github repository, and if it makes sense I'd be
happy to move it to the gentoo org as it is just an etc-update
alternative.

To quote from one of the few wikipedia policies that I like, "be
bold!"  Just remember it belongs to all of us.

To the gentoo community in general - unless you want to get involved
in the initial setup, I'd refrain from posting any access requests
until you're actually ready to make some kind of use of it.  If you do
want to get involved productively then by all means speak up, whether
you're a gentoo dev or not (and the team can figure out to what extent
non-devs should have access - if we're going to host anything that
actually ends up distributed like sources for tools we should control
access in general).

Rich

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Matthew Summers]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 221 bytes --]

I think I have missed somebody, please email me or reply here if you are a
dev and want access. So far we have an overlay for python and
gentoo.github.com for repos.

Cheers

-- 
Matthew W. Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 383 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Michael Weber]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hello Matthew,

On 06/11/2012 01:14 AM, Matthew Summers wrote:
> I think I have missed somebody, please email me or reply here if
> you are a dev and want access. So far we have an overlay for python
> and gentoo.github.com <http://gentoo.github.com> for repos.

please add me (xmw on github.com) to the Gentoo organization.

Thanks.

- --
Gentoo Dev
http://xmw.de/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk/XDy8ACgkQknrdDGLu8JB8TAD/Ta37mPdVb5kE/lleH/gjP6J6
85cXVhBcx5HH4lGXPVQBAIVQ2HRglqqPWvW8uG8bNOocmoP9XeeQICd8atZQOYQN
=IKg6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Theo Chatzimichos]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Michael Weber <xmw@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hello Matthew,
>
> On 06/11/2012 01:14 AM, Matthew Summers wrote:
>> I think I have missed somebody, please email me or reply here if
>> you are a dev and want access. So far we have an overlay for python
>> and gentoo.github.com <http://gentoo.github.com> for repos.
>
> please add me (xmw on github.com) to the Gentoo organization.
>
> Thanks.

Done

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Markos Chandras]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 06/11/2012 12:14 AM, Matthew Summers wrote:
> I think I have missed somebody, please email me or reply here if
> you are a dev and want access. So far we have an overlay for python
> and gentoo.github.com for repos.
> 
> Cheers
> 
Please add me as well. Thanks

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
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=H3/q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Theo Chatzimichos]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 403 bytes --]

On Saturday 16 of June 2012 00:55:50 Markos Chandras wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> On 06/11/2012 12:14 AM, Matthew Summers wrote:
> > I think I have missed somebody, please email me or reply here if
> > you are a dev and want access. So far we have an overlay for python
> > and gentoo.github.com for repos.
> > 
> > Cheers
> 
> Please add me as well. Thanks

Rejected.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Michał Górny]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 385 bytes --]

On Fri, 18 May 2012 16:13:04 -0500
Matthew Summers <quantumsummers@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Due to a fortunate and unexpected sequence of events, gentoo now has
> an organizational github account.
> 
> I pose this question to you, the readers: What do you think we should
> do with this?

Matt, could you set the organization logo somehow?

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Vítor Brandão]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 575 bytes --]

2012/5/25 Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>

> On Fri, 18 May 2012 16:13:04 -0500
> Matthew Summers <quantumsummers@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > Due to a fortunate and unexpected sequence of events, gentoo now has
> > an organizational github account.
> >
> > I pose this question to you, the readers: What do you think we should
> > do with this?
>
> Matt, could you set the organization logo somehow?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Michał Górny
>

github.com/gentoo "Member since Feb 05, 2009"? I thought it was created now.

--
Vítor Brandão (noisebleed)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1957 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Matthew Summers]

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Vítor Brandão
<vitorbrandao.pt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> github.com/gentoo "Member since Feb 05, 2009"? I thought it was created now.
>
> --
> Vítor Brandão (noisebleed)

It was created then, by someone not affiliated with Gentoo. I noticed
it and emailed the guy. He transferred ownership to me and therefore
to Gentoo.

-- 
Matthew W. Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Vítor Brandão]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 648 bytes --]

2012/5/25 Matthew Summers <quantumsummers@gentoo.org>

> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Vítor Brandão
> <vitorbrandao.pt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > github.com/gentoo "Member since Feb 05, 2009"? I thought it was created
> now.
> >
> > --
> > Vítor Brandão (noisebleed)
>
> It was created then, by someone not affiliated with Gentoo. I noticed
> it and emailed the guy. He transferred ownership to me and therefore
> to Gentoo.
>

Ok, mistery explained.

About organization members, who can join? Anyone with a @gentoo.org address?

>
> --
> Matthew W. Summers
> Gentoo Foundation Inc.
>

--
Vítor Brandão (noisebleed)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1329 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Matthew Summers]

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Vítor Brandão
<vitorbrandao.pt@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/5/25 Matthew Summers <quantumsummers@gentoo.org>
>>
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Vítor Brandão
>> <vitorbrandao.pt@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > github.com/gentoo "Member since Feb 05, 2009"? I thought it was created
>> > now.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Vítor Brandão (noisebleed)
>>
>> It was created then, by someone not affiliated with Gentoo. I noticed
>> it and emailed the guy. He transferred ownership to me and therefore
>> to Gentoo.
>
>
> Ok, mistery explained.
>
> About organization members, who can join? Anyone with a @gentoo.org address?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthew W. Summers
>> Gentoo Foundation Inc.
>
>
> --
> Vítor Brandão (noisebleed)

Right now, just official gentoo devs and staff. We may change this at
some point in the future. This is still undergoing policy review,
since we obtained the github org unexpectedly.

-- 
Matthew W. Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Pandu Poluan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 731 bytes --]

On May 25, 2012 11:18 PM, "Matthew Summers" <quantumsummers@gentoo.org>
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Vítor Brandão
> <vitorbrandao.pt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > github.com/gentoo "Member since Feb 05, 2009"? I thought it was created
now.
> >
> > --
> > Vítor Brandão (noisebleed)
>
> It was created then, by someone not affiliated with Gentoo. I noticed
> it and emailed the guy. He transferred ownership to me and therefore
> to Gentoo.
>
> --
> Matthew W. Summers
> Gentoo Foundation Inc.
>

What a kind man.

When the Gentoo github goes fully operational, I think a 'thank you' note
on its main page is in order. Probably linked to the guy's own github page,
if he has one.

Rgds,

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1075 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo now has a Github "organization"

[Matthew Summers]

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2012 16:13:04 -0500
> Matthew Summers <quantumsummers@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> Due to a fortunate and unexpected sequence of events, gentoo now has
>> an organizational github account.
>>
>> I pose this question to you, the readers: What do you think we should
>> do with this?
>
> Matt, could you set the organization logo somehow?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Michał Górny

Hmm, I think it requires a Gravatar account to set a logo. I guess I
can do this, unless someone already has.

-- 
Matthew W. Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.