From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-project+bounces-1836-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1S3Fxw-0006Vr-4P
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:03:23 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4884E07B6
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri,  2 Mar 2012 00:03:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f181.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AFAE05DD
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  1 Mar 2012 21:49:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obceq6 with SMTP id eq6so1380446obc.40
        for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:49:45 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of vivo75@gmail.com designates 10.60.4.202 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.4.202;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of vivo75@gmail.com designates 10.60.4.202 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=vivo75@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=vivo75@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.4.202])
        by 10.60.4.202 with SMTP id m10mr3175963oem.10.1330638585260 (num_hops = 1);
        Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:49:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=QE1Vl9EoYJcnZbhj1O65nJdZV5dU0FWiVVe6N1o5uHE=;
        b=o+uPhYceuENS/tMgYUh8zZlYOogSIpOLPBffF6UHqeOGZsewUAB3Oe7sJ1dHEf0An3
         LHP2hKnS9czsjyDEoQ6yna5t+v2LzCLxnmrawk2mOpxhfZS/BjYgBuug+pL+NCmcm4Ra
         LrcarEv7NqoFAzF45kaOmE9T4bHIxCx6vklR260tY7Fbssqz7phd097D5jFuVkT7k2FS
         T/EmoM0zakXgAa8qpcr2XrNR2/gGYL5fjA2EqEIT0Ahsyh4tkZBnoWSqRO0oEhruWRRz
         iQ9gEWYn0bELTF6icAr5a8nUuci2y7tbdrBTAu0BJ46zarXg4iQhTHr3VCmB5tlR8Z9Z
         OteQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.4.202 with SMTP id m10mr2707354oem.10.1330638585179; Thu,
 01 Mar 2012 13:49:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.61.34 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:49:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1330637800.4093.0@NeddySeagoon>
References: <20303.20351.367788.79112@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	<1330637800.4093.0@NeddySeagoon>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 22:49:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD6zcDxqM1xQknEMC_1pmQ=UV-B22Z2JG-qi0-viyUfFUBCLqw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-03-13
From: Francesco Riosa <vivo75@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 5d212369-6c85-4889-8d4b-e249302bbdfb
X-Archives-Hash: 9b0cda9bde49819e9025fd00e2a79a9d

2012/3/1 Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@gentoo.org>:
> On 2012.03.01 10:29, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> I agree that en_*.UTF-8 is a reasonable setting. I think for LC_CTYPE
>> it doesn't even matter if it's en_US or en_GB.
>>
>> Ulrich
>>
>>
>
> Team,
>
> As an Englishman, it hurts to say it but for consistencys sake it needs
> to be en_US.
>
> Everything else I can think of uses American as a default. Xorg,
> console keymaps, even ls --colour fails.

It hurt to say I do always underestimate pills of humor I (try to)
insert in emails.
At the time of the first post I didn't knew of a C.utf-8 possibility
(or that would have been my choice) but otherwise the most logical is
en_US.

Another thing I do really don't know yet is how this reflect on
file-system paths.
File system is safe because it's encoding agnostic, it eats all but \0
and "/" right?
But how do applications react to a change in the LC_* variables?