From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5081381F3 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B38E9E0DF5; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com (mail-pb0-f46.google.com [209.85.160.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D61E0DF4 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id rq2so438741pbb.33 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:16:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4Lccv9+X98umUDLXD6x28fkRgjhvAz9Jhx2tIBxrZ/4=; b=psT3hMgxPJB47eKmh4ToMCkgaPCuZlmptkQvBwG+WucdkPhmxIL1McIXenIT7AJbgE KbnOcWWYwtCScPMeVlNov5DUqwoJ0lCgyZha7IqU7CS+u1ryic+RoGTM5A+SkowEkXe7 bdwwfYSUIsDjpVTkqa6YiWWza3DpTUavp+QnJfYYRlBFHUdsgCHqwMHKimFPcQOWpKmr sqcjKymONrGhGJTuxafe7ZFOLNMQpBgY+s7Cnf6+19gvliOiRExLyY28Yax76nMBMIHv nVbYUoH24+qyI1lW+LCWex9khtVZ20vP2xGGXjJ2U0TBaVFoQM7dZJ1KQWNZCgq9aiGa 5c6w== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.194.104 with SMTP id hv8mr3558989pbc.168.1377782164013; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: yngwin@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.62.138 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:16:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <521EE590.9060100@gentoo.org> References: <21020.30575.805569.383992@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <521EE590.9060100@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:16:03 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hwnCMpBQdBIltNn0vJPPL5UTHzw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-09-10 From: Ben de Groot To: gentoo-project Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: fe702e03-f2c5-4a97-97bb-be7fcddfabe8 X-Archives-Hash: 4b7f59440da3c259829609083b70e486 On 29 August 2013 14:09, Michael Weber wrote: > On 08/28/2013 01:15 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> The feedback on the original question was mostly positive. >> Most people agree that the long stabilization queues for these >> architectures create problems >> for maintainers wishing to drop old versions. > Is this the only motivation? Drop all the effort that has been put into > stabilization work on minor arches just for some impatient maintainers? > > Keywording/Stabilization is a process we all agreed on joining, so live > with it. Minor arches holding up GLSAs and removal of vulnerable stable ebuilds for 3 months or more is *not* acceptable, and not something I agreed to when joining... If they can't even do security stabilizations in a reasonable timeframe, they have no business being considered stable arches. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer