From: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:52:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAr7Pr8OGLiGbu92ko95rSeffdSAKOVpX=Vt5YahgxXgw_GefQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_=TEfavYkVifr1xeuskj_8M4O7F7SDt8f6=okyTVwFU6A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1955 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> How would somebody sue "Gentoo" when Gentoo is just a trademark of
> >> SPI? There would be no legal entity called Gentoo to sue. That's the
> >> whole point. If somebody wants to sue SPI then that becomes SPI's
> >> problem, though obviously as a project we would cooperate with them to
> >> minimize this risk.
> >
> > A suit against "Gentoo" aka:
> > https://www.gentoo.org/inside-gentoo/developers/
> >
> > "A business partnership, a nonprofit organization, or a group of citizens
> > can be parties in a lawsuit if the court accepts that group as
> representing
> > 1 side of the dispute."
> >
>
> Sure, but in this case the first two do not exist, so Gentoo could not
> be named in a lawsuit. Certainly any group of Gentoo
> developers/contributors could be named in a lawsuit, and so could
> their next door neighbors. And that is no different from today as
> you've pointed out.
>
> My point is that today if somebody messes up they are personally
> liable and the Gentoo Foundation could also be liable. If we moved to
> the SPI model then the individuals would still be personally liable,
> and SPI could also be liable. And I assume that SPI is better at
> managing its own liability.
>
I think this is just everyone being nitpicky.
SPI reduces the liability of the Gentoo Foundation (since the board and
officers have specific legal duties that get taken over by SPI.) I don't
think the SPI changes the liability of the foundation members (who do not
receive indemnification either way) or non-members. So saying "there is no
Gentoo to sue" to me is disingenuous. For most people on this thread the
situation is the same; the board and officers encompass only 5 humans.
-A
>
> --
> Rich
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2968 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-16 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-14 21:43 [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 Andreas K. Huettel
2017-01-14 23:03 ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-14 23:08 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2017-01-14 23:19 ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-14 23:22 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2017-01-14 23:25 ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-15 20:26 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 1:16 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-15 20:28 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 21:00 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-15 22:23 ` Raymond Jennings
2017-01-16 1:01 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 14:56 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 20:31 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 20:59 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 14:52 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 15:06 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 16:31 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 16:56 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 17:35 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 17:59 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:08 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 18:23 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:10 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 18:13 ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:19 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:25 ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 18:46 ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:58 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:13 ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:46 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:52 ` Alec Warner [this message]
2017-01-16 19:08 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:20 ` Dale
2017-01-16 19:34 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 19:54 ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:11 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 20:31 ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:40 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 20:47 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 20:57 ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:27 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 20:38 ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:51 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 21:09 ` Roy Bamford
2017-01-16 19:31 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 19:20 ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:43 ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:52 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:21 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 19:19 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 17:50 ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 18:01 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:02 ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 18:10 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 20:16 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2017-01-16 20:23 ` M. J. Everitt
2017-01-16 20:27 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2017-01-16 20:42 ` Dale
2017-01-16 21:41 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 21:37 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 18:40 ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-16 18:49 ` Dale
2017-01-15 15:00 ` Roy Bamford
2017-01-15 15:30 ` Rich Freeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAr7Pr8OGLiGbu92ko95rSeffdSAKOVpX=Vt5YahgxXgw_GefQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=antarus@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox