public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:52:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAr7Pr8OGLiGbu92ko95rSeffdSAKOVpX=Vt5YahgxXgw_GefQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_=TEfavYkVifr1xeuskj_8M4O7F7SDt8f6=okyTVwFU6A@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1955 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> How would somebody sue "Gentoo" when Gentoo is just a trademark of
> >> SPI?  There would be no legal entity called Gentoo to sue.  That's the
> >> whole point.  If somebody wants to sue SPI then that becomes SPI's
> >> problem, though obviously as a project we would cooperate with them to
> >> minimize this risk.
> >
> > A suit against "Gentoo" aka:
> > https://www.gentoo.org/inside-gentoo/developers/
> >
> > "A business partnership, a nonprofit organization, or a group of citizens
> > can be parties in a lawsuit if the court accepts that group as
> representing
> > 1 side of the dispute."
> >
>
> Sure, but in this case the first two do not exist, so Gentoo could not
> be named in a lawsuit.  Certainly any group of Gentoo
> developers/contributors could be named in a lawsuit, and so could
> their next door neighbors.  And that is no different from today as
> you've pointed out.
>
> My point is that today if somebody messes up they are personally
> liable and the Gentoo Foundation could also be liable.  If we moved to
> the SPI model then the individuals would still be personally liable,
> and SPI could also be liable.  And I assume that SPI is better at
> managing its own liability.
>

I think this is just everyone being nitpicky.

SPI reduces the liability of the Gentoo Foundation (since the board and
officers have specific legal duties that get taken over by SPI.) I don't
think the SPI changes the liability of the foundation members (who do not
receive indemnification either way) or non-members. So saying "there is no
Gentoo to sue" to me is disingenuous. For most people on this thread the
situation is the same; the board and officers encompass only 5 humans.

-A


>
> --
> Rich
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2968 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-16 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-14 21:43 [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 Andreas K. Huettel
2017-01-14 23:03 ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-14 23:08   ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2017-01-14 23:19     ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-14 23:22       ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2017-01-14 23:25         ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-15 20:26     ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15  1:16   ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-15 20:28     ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 21:00       ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-15 22:23         ` Raymond Jennings
2017-01-16  1:01           ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 14:56             ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 20:31     ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-15 20:59       ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 14:52         ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 15:06           ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 16:31             ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 16:56               ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 17:35                 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 17:59                   ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:08                     ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 18:23                       ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:10                         ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 18:13                     ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:19                       ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:25                         ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 18:46                           ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:58                             ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:13                               ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:46                           ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:52                             ` Alec Warner [this message]
2017-01-16 19:08                               ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:20                                 ` Dale
2017-01-16 19:34                                   ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 19:54                                     ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:11                                       ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 20:31                                         ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:40                                           ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 20:47                                             ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 20:57                                             ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:27                                       ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 20:38                                         ` Dale
2017-01-16 20:51                                           ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 21:09                                           ` Roy Bamford
2017-01-16 19:31                                 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 19:20                             ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:43                         ` Dale
2017-01-16 18:52                           ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 19:21                             ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 19:19                         ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 17:50               ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 18:01                 ` Rich Freeman
2017-01-16 18:02                   ` Alec Warner
2017-01-16 18:10                   ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 20:16                     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2017-01-16 20:23                       ` M. J. Everitt
2017-01-16 20:27                         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2017-01-16 20:42                           ` Dale
2017-01-16 21:41                             ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 21:37                       ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2017-01-16 18:40                   ` Matthew Thode
2017-01-16 18:49                     ` Dale
2017-01-15 15:00 ` Roy Bamford
2017-01-15 15:30   ` Rich Freeman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAr7Pr8OGLiGbu92ko95rSeffdSAKOVpX=Vt5YahgxXgw_GefQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=antarus@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox