From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A505138334 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF47DE0954; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com (mail-ed1-f42.google.com [209.85.208.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BCF1E093D for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id y19-v6so9908989edd.2 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 17:09:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=AqlOPp9xCP84kFQ6ThVoPx3jXp8qCm8q9AJhZ86Ke5U=; b=Xq4FtXNEh9m10voR22MdDKaRj4MOcSNWV/JOMp6pQX86aHNOJowW+sg5Y7N5f4a38I YVLPm5OA6QiuStDRvLy7LFHdZUtETJVRNrgn7UbkoU5MPQIOnD1V3K+XU/D+BmEDm1oh akqDXubD7gw4DbV4bNQ3CmZ4dSrQmV+sC5ASp8C1UgrdvV/1VoqpEBDtjfXsXOfuKyt8 zvToHxF3KPbafJynpXyKteyqEZktN8mr9DPwawhYU/dJKURTgg8SGDTBb7BI19cZkAWq 2T6e0xbkCrPX51Lg+59cZUNvOF2Ll02hItrtP9J61t/g5eOh8VI89g/xoGh//G7ZucE+ gZ8w== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoj8s0yNgsOhebeV+hBbxGGOAGoDd1Mi/xjh3fpE0VvaPjtl2y0Y AoXr3/nDQRxpyUNEMhWzlVryAKm0fXKwCtoRXF8x3UrVFAY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV626IHDKU28J0+J7Dxtebir/tpVFZC6MLAsrvUE55yk+XW/ZaluKkJy4Cv7YiUXnD7Xl9R1z4FqRL5WkfoxoW7E= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3744:: with SMTP id e4-v6mr4643891ejc.148.1539302990417; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 17:09:50 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180930140524.015249f0@sf> <20181011153139.7700484dc6c452ed570df66a@gentoo.org> <20181012002407.cdc9701a0dbcabef36edff56@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20181012002407.cdc9701a0dbcabef36edff56@gentoo.org> From: Alec Warner Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 20:09:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-10-14 To: gentoo-project Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f225e70577fce7d8" X-Archives-Salt: 32855d0b-85b2-49a0-84a1-9a3625c1a421 X-Archives-Hash: 07353547ab86159d8be4550c63065c12 --000000000000f225e70577fce7d8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 5:24 PM Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:35:13 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Alec Warner wrote: > > > > > My reading of ulm's proposal is that it is allowed. > > > > > Ebuilds "shall" use the simple attribution, not that they "must" use > it. > > > > > To me that implies the simple attribution should be the default, but > the > > > complex attribution is acceptable in the ::gentoo repo. > > > > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding the proposal? > > > > No, you've understood it exactly how it was meant. > > Then please write this explicitly in the proposed change. Right now > it is only "shall" vs "must" difference which may confuse people > and create misunderstanding in future. > If we update the wording, are you happy with the proposal now that we have a shared understanding of its intent? -A > > Best regards, > Andrew Savchenko > --000000000000f225e70577fce7d8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Thu= , Oct 11, 2018 at 5:24 PM Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@gentoo.org> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:35:13 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Alec Warner wrote:
>
> > My reading of ulm's proposal is that it is allowed.
>
> > Ebuilds "shall" use the simple attribution, not that th= ey "must" use it.
>
> > To me that implies the simple attribution should be the default, = but the
> > complex attribution is acceptable in the ::gentoo repo.
>
> > Maybe I'm misunderstanding the proposal?
>
> No, you've understood it exactly how it was meant.

Then please write this explicitly in the proposed change. Right now
it is only "shall" vs "must" difference which may confu= se people
and create misunderstanding in future.

= If we update the wording, are you happy with the proposal now that we have = a shared understanding of its intent?

-A
=C2=A0

Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko
--000000000000f225e70577fce7d8--