On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 5:24 PM Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:35:13 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > >>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Alec Warner wrote:
> >
> > > My reading of ulm's proposal is that it is allowed.
> >
> > > Ebuilds "shall" use the simple attribution, not that they "must" use
> it.
> >
> > > To me that implies the simple attribution should be the default, but
> the
> > > complex attribution is acceptable in the ::gentoo repo.
> >
> > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding the proposal?
> >
> > No, you've understood it exactly how it was meant.
>
> Then please write this explicitly in the proposed change. Right now
> it is only "shall" vs "must" difference which may confuse people
> and create misunderstanding in future.
>

If we update the wording, are you happy with the proposal now that we have
a shared understanding of its intent?

-A


>
> Best regards,
> Andrew Savchenko
>