From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16A3F139085 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60FC921C0CA; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot0-x231.google.com (mail-ot0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DEEE21C0C9 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 104so47915756otd.3 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:02:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=scriptkitty-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=BoDBn2PJzgXl41iXdXbTZYLhHVnlYp7dXu+INFvbVMI=; b=ZhoDa0P7KO+ZNF67jAlJt2n6pY4D7v6YkwqFsIQm6jPPFhDFZI+Xe+s5r3nDhNrOAx r+F7XvxCYOYmNqJ0Qiw56oX5jtyTgESgzgpUi+XvnQzyRMdU8z5snfIo8Qf9U3euG+Bu s4O7E+ai8O0OwMOqpBmSRcDYc9MmBVgMxKBdM3IuqBaS9QhZT1y48fZRrl2jKwRWN0aB d2/2TEWSfl8U5IdBGSlOTAZhBfhWf8NE/68tVn9mUi594NiHOGZb3vje+SXc4ANrjoEQ rQoU82PzEwQtn2Z/UA6zsFOajEVohRRMoKzr3WcSe7AYFWLe5t9q/hmKmxSww/NpBc5U UHDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BoDBn2PJzgXl41iXdXbTZYLhHVnlYp7dXu+INFvbVMI=; b=jWYRWaz51Y/BNjPvcf/LnuUgw0tO/GSqu6q/p2j1E6zngn/XlyEHNSXcHMMBN8Ox1x Fi182O2lzR1VKVwxsPLx6nr2yW6lIvALYbFL71ImMlx3AvMf16pew2kcoaCdLOkeg1ql vDwIdxW9+hhdmoIC8DKJRQpuh++P4KKKE4KAZNufeChuJriwqZM7NnIubLaMpALoKu3s c+12FqILf/MabRU3PfCW5Dt53QmFo5KSrmkn2itZn8Te5omgzRH2P0l2c7vDijnBd/Uo u0y0kenDvT4ulf4ikBxG58dfN7cME09p9utVWXB0/+TgvShaK8VDKhaDvYi7OxqNR8j9 u4OQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK/9LSYsFOwqmxFWV4tPo5zHLwMS4ZEL1vf36pgsEnucLoj15zG1YiorV+9iwlcaZcVAuEby3WDGoGhZA== X-Received: by 10.157.52.66 with SMTP id v60mr16237719otb.61.1484589773386; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:02:53 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com Received: by 10.182.156.15 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:02:52 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [50.184.239.68] In-Reply-To: References: <1604622.bZRWYHrp25@pinacolada> From: Alec Warner Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:02:52 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fiD0jMZxL7i23kOfJINAl4a__8Q Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 To: gentoo-project Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114152c2148b03054639fe87 X-Archives-Salt: 8942e136-6ded-4a26-ac85-38718d2cc584 X-Archives-Hash: cceb3b37740bac9e6bf75d76ba223290 --001a114152c2148b03054639fe87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > > > > I agree with William here. > > > > The SPI does not indemnify its associated projects or members. > > Well, on that I agree with William as well. I never claimed otherwise. > > > > > Its not clear to me how trademark enforcement works, for example. Its > > something I am following up on as part of my SPI review (and FAQ) for the > > Gentoo Board (and its members, all the stuff will be public.) > > > > Are you doing an SPI review? Based on the fact that none of the > Trustees seemed interested in doing one I was actually going to reach > out to them myself, but I'd certainly prefer that it come from the > Trustees. I also wanted a unified front (a bunch of people have been talking about it.) I'll follow up on -nfp regarding who is doing what for SPI. -A > > -- > Rich > > --001a114152c2148b03054639fe87 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On M= on, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>= wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, = 2017 at 12:50 PM, Alec Warner <ant= arus@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> I agree with William here.
>
> The SPI does not indemnify its associated projects or members.

Well, on that I agree with William as well.=C2=A0 I never claimed ot= herwise.

>
> Its not clear to me how trademark enforcement works, for example. Its<= br> > something I am following up on as part of my SPI review (and FAQ) for = the
> Gentoo Board (and its members, all the stuff will be public.)
>

Are you doing an SPI review?=C2=A0 Based on the fact that none of th= e
Trustees seemed interested in doing one I was actually going to reach
out to them myself, but I'd certainly prefer that it come from the
Trustees.

I also wanted a unified front (a = bunch of people have been talking about it.) I'll follow up on -nfp reg= arding who is doing what for SPI.

-A
=C2= =A0

--
Rich


--001a114152c2148b03054639fe87--