From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-2270-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3E61381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:03:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F179E21C051
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:03:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1DB421C00D
for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:44:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com ([209.85.160.53]:37778)
by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <pandu@poluan.info>)
id 1TYZVy-0020l0-J6
for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:44:10 +0700
Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id jt11so254786pbb.40
for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:44:07 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.193.167 with SMTP id hp7mr24909168pbc.124.1352886247278;
Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:44:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.233.136 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:44:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.233.136 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:44:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAB9SyzS6TFpKqFnEj0n3GVST96rkYkn2exDhrymkAUGrb9X6sQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50A1B335.2080907@gentoo.org>
<CAB9SyzS6TFpKqFnEj0n3GVST96rkYkn2exDhrymkAUGrb9X6sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:44:07 +0700
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGXom+3JW=xLaLUNZGS6SnLbchM2vOCeJ-c_+Rth7DtdRw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization
From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15aebf30c86304ce7160b3
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info
X-Archives-Salt: d12d69f9-7cc0-451c-9fa6-aa6d4d3a0b18
X-Archives-Hash: e0cabc525d94e5859c7970d82eb33a81
--047d7b15aebf30c86304ce7160b3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Nov 14, 2012 4:08 PM, "Ben de Groot" <yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On 13 November 2012 10:40, Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Everyone,
>>
>> It is no secret that many of us are unhappy with the direction that udev
>> has taken under the leadership of the systemd developers. That includes
>> Linus Torvalds, who is 'leery of the fact that the udev maintenance
>> seems to have gone into some "crazy mode" where they have made changes
>> that were known to be problematic, and are pure and utter stupidity.'
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/505
>>
>> After speaking with several other Gentoo developers that share Linus'
>> concerns, I have decided to form a team to fork udev. Our plan is to
>> eliminate the separate /usr requirement from our fork, among other
>> things. We will announce the project later this week.
>
>
>
> I applaud this initiative. I would recommend you contact, and try to work
together with, the existing fork of udev, which is available in layman's
udev overlay. There is a corresponding thread on our forums.
>
Great! So that means, we already have something to show to other distros,
then?
And we already have ryao, blueness, and chainsaw all expressing their
desire of forking udev (apologies if I left anyone).
Hmm... need a roll-call, I guess...
Rgds,
--
--047d7b15aebf30c86304ce7160b3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
<p><br>
On Nov 14, 2012 4:08 PM, "Ben de Groot" <<a href="mailto:yngwin@gentoo.org">yngwin@gentoo.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 13 November 2012 10:40, Richard Yao <<a href="mailto:ryao@gentoo.org">ryao@gentoo.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Dear Everyone,<br>
>><br>
>> It is no secret that many of us are unhappy with the direction that udev<br>
>> has taken under the leadership of the systemd developers. That includes<br>
>> Linus Torvalds, who is 'leery of the fact that the udev maintenance<br>
>> seems to have gone into some "crazy mode" where they have made changes<br>
>> that were known to be problematic, and are pure and utter stupidity.'<br>
>><br>
>> <a href="https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/505">https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/505</a><br>
>><br>
>> After speaking with several other Gentoo developers that share Linus'<br>
>> concerns, I have decided to form a team to fork udev. Our plan is to<br>
>> eliminate the separate /usr requirement from our fork, among other<br>
>> things. We will announce the project later this week.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> I applaud this initiative. I would recommend you contact, and try to work together with, the existing fork of udev, which is available in layman's udev overlay. There is a corresponding thread on our forums.<br>
></p>
<p>Great! So that means, we already have something to show to other distros, then? </p>
<p>And we already have ryao, blueness, and chainsaw all expressing their desire of forking udev (apologies if I left anyone). </p>
<p>Hmm... need a roll-call, I guess... </p>
<p>Rgds, <br>
--<br>
</p>
--047d7b15aebf30c86304ce7160b3--