From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-2464-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39B31381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 15:06:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EB10E0AC1;
	Sun, 26 May 2013 15:06:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f52.google.com (mail-bk0-f52.google.com [209.85.214.52])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C1EFE0ABD
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 15:06:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-bk0-f52.google.com with SMTP id mz10so3206409bkb.25
        for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 08:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Tj8kCXc8/PjTMFaOkVAI8XWry7JKyxyzKP5eVuQNWAc=;
        b=EqVpOu38d/xETU5nKYJv8H4+qxDJU+61xGulR94EKZGEPy796F/gLs5CqKPoRRFE15
         xYc8XXKjRzlBTfb93NspZS0GNMFAWe0YjX0cdKVSWn4jYPNPXeW/t23zmGnIUglfZkWB
         dx+zvh/EecOX640xHpXq1m6wbFSmLsXOdW18Q/UeP55hZ6mxCdQVdMfBrWsZaEq3b5tz
         VSaJBXzrtdqm+/Bb4yfOoeaUrjLU3/nRG4Wsjj3BTx+1N03VEaoCygVL+91V6iIpFwBH
         2ckt8VrOdZ4wcd8hkPBq7DyHtwvinNxfvojjS1CdDo3V0x4pWPS5WCJVZ4dIKfBFUOlo
         oqlA==
X-Received: by 10.205.47.133 with SMTP id us5mr11085814bkb.110.1369580807873;
 Sun, 26 May 2013 08:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com
Received: by 10.204.230.2 with HTTP; Sun, 26 May 2013 08:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+Nrkpfbo0i3oK_V5Z5nQNb1bzAgCNkuzPpPL85ts7pZOLRSzw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+Nrkpfbo0i3oK_V5Z5nQNb1bzAgCNkuzPpPL85ts7pZOLRSzw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 09:06:07 -0600
X-Google-Sender-Auth: MTSqMv_rd-KY6om7x4xuR3-gIVU
Message-ID: <CA+CSuA+fGfsPGmw7L8dgz7Ge1_PC83TNJXY3uofhtgB+4YCPRg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Code of Conduct
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 6c65fb10-b357-4313-97fa-437bd7b169d3
X-Archives-Hash: 0ce0124ddaa32ffff69ef1a0acd41d08

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal <scarabeus@ge=
ntoo.org> wrote:
> after last bunch of mails and internal complains I decided it is time to =
do
> something proactive.

I have to applaud the effort but I unfortunately have to warn you that
you are fighting windmills here. The core of the problem is that rules
are useless long-term if nobody enforces them. That takes somebody
with enough balls to make the bold moves. I am typically that person
at devrel but both because it's getting old and (to put it mildly) I'm
not very supported in that approach I mostly gave up. The other thing
is I used to do a lot of pro-active work trying to keep people in
check. I took so much heat that I mostly gave that up too. It also
takes an enormous amount of time.

Bottom line is, and I'm weighing my words very carefully after years
of seeing all this from the inside: nobody cares enough.

Denis.