> On 1 Apr 2022, at 02:27, Sam James wrote: >> On 29 Mar 2022, at 18:56, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> [snip] > >> this is all orthogonal to the git content itself (objects, branches, tags, >> etc...). those should remain in the read-only clobber mode that exists now. >> >> there is no downside for Gentoo here. it's all functionality that can be >> had for free, does not introduce any risks, and many devs are already using >> GH heavily for Gentoo projects -- albeit, they don't do it under the Gentoo >> umbrella, they fork it into their own personal space and maintain it there. > > Yep, and I'm guilty of this as well. I've started making a list of some important > repos we really need to mirror onto our infra at least (inc, but not limited to, > pkgcore). > Sorry, just to finish making the point I'd intended on here: while this might be true, I don't think it's a reason to depend on it more where there's a decent argument against it. It's just a reason to actually migrate away or at least ensure we have contingencies?