From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDA31138334 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 22:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83655E0968; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 22:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FA18E0964 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 22:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (pool-108-44-175-72.clppva.fios.verizon.net [108.44.175.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bman) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E048134B45D for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 22:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 18:22:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <109eea13088507d0b4dd87da6d3463e75ae07e84.camel@gentoo.org> References: <3aab702403d9a7e0bf7246f14a5130acd464ca45.camel@gentoo.org> <20190921105536.2764e1e6@symphony.aura-online.co.uk> <8C6FAD3C-F48F-4B2D-98A5-0CD5CDEF1DF9@gentoo.org> <109eea13088507d0b4dd87da6d3463e75ae07e84.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [RFC] Undertakers: appeal policy To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org From: Aaron Bauman Message-ID: X-Archives-Salt: 035d55cc-cb4e-4e3b-9f17-44739bdffe22 X-Archives-Hash: f3ab69a67baa3a6c2bf643e4e43d9c1c On September 21, 2019 2:48:29 PM EDT, "Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny" wrote: >On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 14:36 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: >> Our PMS is largely maintained >> by a former dev who many do not get along with=2E > >This is not true=2E It is maintained by a few active Gentoo devs, >and by a quick peak last non-Gentoo-dev patch was committed in 2012=2E >In fact, EAPI 7 has been rejected in Paludis=2E > >> Our founder isn't >> really involved as a dev but never wanders too far and maintains a >> fairly friendly fork=2E > >'Friendly fork', right=2E I guess everyone is welcome to watch and make >his/her own opinion=2E However, it doesn't sound like you really have >verified any of those statements=2E > >That's just to correct things=2E Now, guys, can we please stay on topic? > >I welcome all your support but of the three replies so far, nobody has >provided any opinion on the proposal in question=2E The proposal is good, but I find it unnecessary at the same time=2E=20 Of the devs appealing their retirement at the 11th=2E=2E=2E I find most of= them have spent more time debating then just making a few simple commits t= o be active=2E=20 Conversely, I see devs who just contribute and the undertaker's reverse th= e retirement process=2E=20 Contribute || retire=2E=20 --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E