* Re: [gentoo-project] On the way Devrel is constituted
@ 2013-06-20 19:33 99% ` Rich Freeman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Rich Freeman @ 2013-06-20 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-project
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:03 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 2. The leads of these projects should be selected by the projects like
> any other project, but confirmed by the council.
I agree with much of what you posted, but this one bit keeps coming up
and I'm not sure how well it will work. What happens if the two can't
agree? Devrel appoints a lead and council doesn't confirm. Who runs
Devrel until the the new lead is selected? What if the two cannot
reach agreement?
Maybe just spell that out - Devrel selects and council confirms, and
if by so many days after the election of a new council agreement
hasn't been reached then the council can appoint?
I think all are agreed that Council/Trustees/etc should generally be
hands-off, and in reality this is how they have been operating all
along. However, I think it still makes sense to keep these bodies at
the top of the chain of command. It isn't really healthy to define
ambiguous command structures (though our Council/Trustees division
obviously raises this issue already).
Rich
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2013-06-19 20:18 [gentoo-project] On the way Devrel is constituted hasufell
2013-06-20 0:50 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-06-20 2:00 ` Rich Freeman
2013-06-20 3:17 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-06-20 10:44 ` Sean Amoss
2013-06-20 10:50 ` Markos Chandras
2013-06-20 11:25 ` Douglas Dunn
2013-06-20 19:03 ` William Hubbs
2013-06-20 19:33 99% ` Rich Freeman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox