* Re: [gentoo-project] On the way Devrel is constituted
@ 2013-06-20 20:20 99% ` William Hubbs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: William Hubbs @ 2013-06-20 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-project
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 957 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:07:25PM +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> These rules sound all ok, but which real problem are they intended to solve?
Don't ask me, I was just going through the thread trying to come up with
something that most people would agree with. As far as I am aware there
isn't a problem with devrel/qa abusing power.
> If not, what indication exists that makes such abuse of power appear likely
> in the future?
I haven't seen one myself.
> If such a thing has never occured, and there is nothing which indicates
> that it is going to occur, then I think we can drop the rule #2 as it
> introduces only unnecessary bureaucracy. If we start seeing actual abuse of
> power then requiring approval of Council for QA/devrel leads or actions can
> be reconsidered.
If you drop rule 2 from that list, the way I see it, you are just
stating how we are operating now which is fine with me.
William
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2013-06-19 20:18 [gentoo-project] On the way Devrel is constituted hasufell
2013-06-20 0:50 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-06-20 2:00 ` Rich Freeman
2013-06-20 3:17 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-06-20 10:44 ` Sean Amoss
2013-06-20 10:50 ` Markos Chandras
2013-06-20 11:25 ` Douglas Dunn
2013-06-20 19:03 ` William Hubbs
2013-06-20 20:07 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-06-20 20:20 99% ` William Hubbs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox