* Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012
@ 2012-10-05 6:43 99% ` Patrick Lauer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Patrick Lauer @ 2012-10-05 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-project
On 10/05/12 14:28, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 04-10-2012 20:32:41 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> And what about current usage in the tree with current eapis? Regarding
>>> IUSE_FLATTENED I have no problem with it, but will need to talk with
>>> portage team also as they have the current implementation
>>
>> And then, I think council should clarify what to do with current usages
>> in the tree with eapi0-4
>
> Why should the Council clarify that?
>
> (Not that we're unwilling, but I don't see why Council should be the
> initiator here.)
>
For quite a while we have had ideas and discussions about deprecating
older EAPIs - expected benefits being things like not remembering the
little variations between the six official flavours.
I would suggest adding a repoman warning for adding new ebuilds with
EAPI={1,2,3} now, turn that into an error for EAPI 1 in a short time (3
months?), then do the same for EAPI 2 a short while later with a longer
timeline (as there are substantially more ebuilds with EAPI 2)
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2012-09-25 9:24 [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 Fabian Groffen
2012-09-25 19:32 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-10-02 11:30 ` Fabian Groffen
2012-10-03 17:18 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-10-04 18:32 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-10-05 6:28 ` Fabian Groffen
2012-10-05 6:43 99% ` Patrick Lauer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox