* Re: [gentoo-project] EAPI bump should require revbump
@ 2012-10-20 20:51 99% ` Roy Bamford
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Roy Bamford @ 2012-10-20 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-project
On 2012.10.19 14:52, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> Hey all -- there was just a discussion in #gentoo-dev about this, so
> following up here..
>
> Due to the fact that an EAPI-bump can imply different behaviour from
> eclasses or the PM, an EAPI-bump should in most cases also require an
> ebuild revbump.
>
> Why i'm bringing this up here, is because Chansaw and I were
> wondering
> if common sense will not be enough to ensure this and it should be
> made a policy to revbump when migrating to a new EAPI ?
>
>
Common sense is much rarer than you might expect.
It should be explicit.
--
Regards,
Roy Bamford
(Neddyseagoon) a member of
elections
gentoo-ops
forum-mods
trustees
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2012-10-19 13:52 [gentoo-project] EAPI bump should require revbump Ian Stakenvicius
2012-10-20 20:51 99% ` Roy Bamford
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox