* [gentoo-project] EAPI bump should require revbump
@ 2012-10-19 13:52 99% Ian Stakenvicius
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ian Stakenvicius @ 2012-10-19 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-project
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hey all -- there was just a discussion in #gentoo-dev about this, so
following up here..
Due to the fact that an EAPI-bump can imply different behaviour from
eclasses or the PM, an EAPI-bump should in most cases also require an
ebuild revbump.
Why i'm bringing this up here, is because Chansaw and I were wondering
if common sense will not be enough to ensure this and it should be
made a policy to revbump when migrating to a new EAPI ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iF4EAREIAAYFAlCBWwsACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDq9QEAv4dtB8q5h4k6P5Fcl5KJ6AZz
+stbD96s7kNG5cLu1zcBAJ/iyTOvAH5GIYhnSDKOrz2JODD7Zq0II9W+7L4XMfQa
=03Pd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2012-10-19 13:52 99% [gentoo-project] EAPI bump should require revbump Ian Stakenvicius
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox