public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* [gentoo-project] EAPI bump should require revbump
@ 2012-10-19 13:52 99% Ian Stakenvicius
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ian Stakenvicius @ 2012-10-19 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-project

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hey all -- there was just a discussion in #gentoo-dev about this, so
following up here..

Due to the fact that an EAPI-bump can imply different behaviour from
eclasses or the PM, an EAPI-bump should in most cases also require an
ebuild revbump.

Why i'm bringing this up here, is because Chansaw and I were wondering
if common sense will not be enough to ensure this and it should be
made a policy to revbump when migrating to a new EAPI ?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlCBWwsACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDq9QEAv4dtB8q5h4k6P5Fcl5KJ6AZz
+stbD96s7kNG5cLu1zcBAJ/iyTOvAH5GIYhnSDKOrz2JODD7Zq0II9W+7L4XMfQa
=03Pd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2012-10-19 13:52 99% [gentoo-project] EAPI bump should require revbump Ian Stakenvicius

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox