* Re: [gentoo-project] EAPI bump should require revbump
@ 2012-10-25 13:16 99% ` Ian Stakenvicius
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ian Stakenvicius @ 2012-10-25 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-project
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 25/10/12 08:41 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 19.10.2012 16.52, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> Hey all -- there was just a discussion in #gentoo-dev about
>> this, so following up here..
>>
> I don't think changing EAPI for stable packages is allowed. That
> means we are only talking about testing packages for this thread
> and I think there it's fine to follow the established rule already
> mentioned. If developers break things continuously without
> testing, take up the issue with QA.
[ Merge! ]
Also please post these things
> to gentoo-dev mailing list next time. This mailing list is for
> project wide non technical issues.
>
It was suggested to me to post here because #1) it's a policy
discussion rather than a technical one, and #2) it reaches a bigger
audience as many devs have tuned out to gentoo-dev@ ..
As for your previous statement -- I was not aware of a policy that
excludes EAPI bumps from occurring on stable packages. This would
certainly suffice to alleviate the original concerns and probably be
more effective as a policy than always requiring revbump on EAPI change.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iF4EAREIAAYFAlCJO7kACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBSzQD8Cj5o3NdNSRU7d/GmUwPw5nnl
whHrdX4s7kYjU7uMZz4A/izpnDcekv/QNaskk6LUHuUPnFNPcRMGc2nlY0qACZYY
=JHtD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2012-10-19 13:52 [gentoo-project] EAPI bump should require revbump Ian Stakenvicius
2012-10-25 12:41 ` Petteri Räty
2012-10-25 13:16 99% ` Ian Stakenvicius
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox