From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05E97158649 for ; Fri, 12 May 2023 15:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F27C3E08F7; Fri, 12 May 2023 15:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAEB2E08F7 for ; Fri, 12 May 2023 15:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <9f55ab30003917669079a03853dff4ff76b24080.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council Meeting 2023-05-14: Agenda From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: council@gentoo.org Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 17:55:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <905f8802eb6da5a3463022275d5e694dbc4adefd.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 6efd70e7-ac63-42d3-896a-2ebe6920857a X-Archives-Hash: d4ae33e38ecf515a3e01a7a03d1ca8e2 On Fri, 2023-05-12 at 17:40 +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote: > Hi Micha=C5=82, >=20 > On 12.05.23 14:27, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > The next Council meeting will be on Sunday 2023-05-14, 19:00 UTC in the > > #gentoo-council channel on Libera Chat. > >=20 > > Agenda: > >=20 > > 1. Roll call > > 2. Mark GLEP 78 as final [1,2] > > 3. Open bugs with Council participation [3] > > 4. Open floor >=20 > Is there a reason why the request to council to vote on whether EGO_SUM= =20 > should be reinstated ("un-deprecated") or not, did not make it on the=20 > agenda? >=20 I don't see it in replies to the call for agenda items: https://marc.info/?l=3Dgentoo-project&m=3D168348480027610&w=3D2 --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny