From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D346F1382C5 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB13CE0905; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8F1CE0903 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <92b7d4ac1e454255ae6f0634a3e42218d0027fdf.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Triumvirate in Gentoo From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 17:20:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200604080111.3eb71d89@storm> References: <31f6f5b574e0818a8fca3549e696ea18793c22ab.camel@gentoo.org> <1392a7db-ea29-4b8c-be6d-bf4bdfa6748f@gentoo.org> <20200604080111.3eb71d89@storm> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-z92tBy/H4Wz+8sXq9CXI" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: f123c806-79c7-4f50-9ae7-be1ebafe045a X-Archives-Hash: 75c89bdad331670cb077248381295d1b --=-z92tBy/H4Wz+8sXq9CXI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 08:01 -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:16:22 +0300 > Joonas Niilola wrote: >=20 > > On 6/4/20 4:12 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > 3. Do all decisions require a majority of the 3, or will these > > > individuals have their own scope? Will a new technical GLEP just be > > > approved by the "tech lead" or all three? Could the two non-tech > > > leads override the tech lead on a tech decision? Obviously the goal > > > is collaboration but presumably you want this to solve situations > > > where collaboration already fails. =20 > >=20 > > What will be council's role/fate after triumvirate? > >=20 > > -- juippis > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > They won't exist. Neither will the foundation if I understood it right. Exactly. Council is being replaced directly, and Trustees if possible at the given point in time. If they can't disappear entirely, we can just set org lead to provide a bridge to Trustees. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-z92tBy/H4Wz+8sXq9CXI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl7ZEUtfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA6NgQgAtZy82PUEuuX/H6Txwb656vChGVF9eMNq+NTUd5FCX1aXGDsdfB7+AIRU qP85mbjvb8jk+YMI/b+iYuSlaoRZQsYTYbwn5+/70p3DENZaVNEAZuBSauZK8Glf GbwjiY70RRC6w+5IZ78z93eUaAe4Oun5+0V/PwKGNMk/4ygGD83rekmprwWDyZtv KCMGVZSbo3FolhXm5S2P9bqaD0Co0fVPWUPb51Nnxy+F/qKxWNcGdECZusryAwzY dTLrIy3xGPCLN7ZLCwVgefLAW6tBpz88/qIxZkB9B8l/KQW14Wy8KRx4V9Jmoymg ADGNuZHeAfljOXh5Xacbup8ZItOv3A== =fp5f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-z92tBy/H4Wz+8sXq9CXI--