[gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2021-11-14

[gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2021-11-14

[Andreas K. Huettel]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 482 bytes --]

Hi all, 

the next council meeting will be on 2021-11-14. Please reply to this mail
with proposed agenda items. Do not hesitate to repeat your item here with 
a pointer if you previously suggested one (since the last meeting).

The agenda for the meeting will be sent out on 2021-11-10.

Please reply to the gentoo-project list.

Cheers,
Andreas

-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]

[gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2021-11-14

[Marek Szuba]

On 05/11/2021 20:13, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:

> the next council meeting will be on 2021-11-14. Please reply to this mail
> with proposed agenda items.

Unsurprisingly, I would like the Council to vote on dropping hppa, ppc, 
sparc and x86 (with a separate vote for each, I'd say) to ~arch-only status.

-- 
Marecki

Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2021-11-14

[Arthur Zamarin]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1355 bytes --]

On 08/11/2021 14.17, Marek Szuba wrote:
> On 05/11/2021 20:13, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> 
>> the next council meeting will be on 2021-11-14. Please reply to this mail
>> with proposed agenda items.
> 
> Unsurprisingly, I would like the Council to vote on dropping hppa, ppc,
> sparc and x86 (with a separate vote for each, I'd say) to ~arch-only
> status.
> 

Well, regarding sparc, I have just joined the arch team (thank you sam
for the help). After some short setup time and becoming comfortable with
it, I believe I will help keywording and stabilization effort. So I
think we will have no issues to be up there with amd64 in state.

Based on previous history with rekeywording for dev-python/* packages
(sigh, upstream love to add new dependencies), sparc is one of the
fastest. In stabilizations they are mostly one of the first.

So I would like to ask for sparc to remain stable. Also, it would be
nice if we had some kind of metric to measure if an arch isn't "fast"
enough.

And in this place, I want to call other Gentoo developers to join the
various arches teams. They are nice and will help you to enter it, so we
could bring even better experience to our users. We have dev boxes, even
monster size like the sparc one.

-- 
Arthur Zamarin
arthurzam@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (Python, GURU, Sparc)

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2021-11-14

[Ulrich Mueller]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 755 bytes --]

>>>>> On Fri, 05 Nov 2021, Andreas K Huettel wrote:

> the next council meeting will be on 2021-11-14. Please reply to this mail
> with proposed agenda items. Do not hesitate to repeat your item here with 
> a pointer if you previously suggested one (since the last meeting).

> The agenda for the meeting will be sent out on 2021-11-10.

> Please reply to the gentoo-project list.

The deadline has passed, but can I still sneak UIDs and GIDs in?
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/5bad6853520e3ab182f6399a53198fec

In summary, we have run out of available GIDs in the range below 500.

Proposal: Open the range 60001..60999 (with possible later extension to
higher IDs) for allocation of additional UIDs and GIDs.

Ulrich

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 507 bytes --]