From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B276139085 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E62A2340BD; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tsukuyomi.43-1.org (tsukuyomi.43-1.org [IPv6:2a01:4f8:173:743::1:50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 419A9234074 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:17:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Matthias Maier To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Merging Trustees and Council / Developers and Foundation - 1.0 reply In-Reply-To: (Alec Warner's message of "Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:20:51 -0800") References: <35d4687b-4cbd-cf79-254c-c7476c06bb3a@gentoo.org> <1d601c44-e136-382d-54f4-27d3437dfcc5@gentoo.org> <87r349iy3d.fsf@kestrel.kyomu.43-1.org> <877f61bkxw.fsf@kestrel.kyomu.43-1.org> <87y3yha5me.fsf@kestrel.kyomu.43-1.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:16:54 -0600 Message-ID: <87pojt9zkp.fsf@kestrel.kyomu.43-1.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 827e8756-e3e6-4fa0-8fc9-17cd2add2c4b X-Archives-Hash: 132e2413980f45a7213b40b07179ab50 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain > It might be a logical step (I'm unconvinced it is the *only* logical step.) > Hence this whole thread, no? :) It is definitely not the only logical step :-D Regarding this thread: "Formally have Foundation oversee top level projects" So far this doesn't read like mitigating a participation problem with the Foundation at all. It reads more like the wish of a number of Foundation members and trustees to have more influence on the community. Best, Matthias --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYdoSmAAoJELhOzYlK7nn/280P+wfFDPUgi4meFe8AxanXNExN X5mrXXGXE/bg1VvYUWoHQukUAEOa4eeM+kMOlglLlU/mY0yVhfNsRoxFld+OtMhJ Jtx5zeOapuZzFmQ7sObQJSNUi8f6UEJ+7C4yPvracJcRoA5js49VfW7/m7CEYgPm dRa+FFqfVxhWeiKnksfaOAJNj2gCbhYaslyWYvapoXSFByfefKqJ8bXogGSGQHvc 0l0go5ZZgp5Ut0w+kTvFX3WhqaAWpxM47FxkWuw0Bz25PNRPX/phBzz+Cn7cWz8b 5BnqL4VN2Aly4xLLFBq8W+bxmOWJHjDcvVPSFoWjdbsveL6HXuzKT1XJACd6+op+ rH/gKtkATwcZzNjw6aIw5NZs0iExWpldSAAmRhv4qKdLS0XkS9fQX6Qog8IzMiYi AMgHUTB1Nf5kCtoqvw9KkLO97R6Wwvh9VgftQpmTfS6pTkRwm0utm6BhhTQEJy7w zB9rvejsiS/wtImhi/f/roUhkPQl53KdD8PGUpdDk0QVAzv2TMA5ha0N2yMd2aG0 pIQJXEiC/APOTa6yYVE4QpmtUFZm0MsOWqAa+vSQzFaISlORlJD4H5IT4bG1kWMU VMpCCkUWtN/OHxJBVK5zZ3NYfsSOBOwOwtWz2sM2DH7IK6bEOTWcwCkycEGHGtop WfGPL8mcCTwzU/FJlZwD =mwDc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--