From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFEC015806E for ; Sat, 13 May 2023 22:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1118DE07F2; Sat, 13 May 2023 22:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7E5AE07F2 for ; Sat, 13 May 2023 22:02:34 +0000 (UTC) References: <905f8802eb6da5a3463022275d5e694dbc4adefd.camel@gentoo.org> <9f55ab30003917669079a03853dff4ff76b24080.camel@gentoo.org> <9da77897-6997-93f9-02ee-c007723de0d7@gentoo.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.3; emacs 29.0.90 From: Sam James To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= , council@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council Meeting 2023-05-14: Agenda Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 23:02:11 +0100 In-reply-to: <9da77897-6997-93f9-02ee-c007723de0d7@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <87cz3351qi.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 56831ae8-6cd0-45de-a269-3d4e8481f179 X-Archives-Hash: 849c659fb5489c496b0312dcfeb2a70f --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Florian Schmaus writes: > On 12.05.23 17:55, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> On Fri, 2023-05-12 at 17:40 +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote: >>> Hi Micha=C5=82, >>> >>> On 12.05.23 14:27, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >>>> The next Council meeting will be on Sunday 2023-05-14, 19:00 UTC in the >>>> #gentoo-council channel on Libera Chat. >>>> >>>> Agenda: >>>> >>>> 1. Roll call >>>> 2. Mark GLEP 78 as final [1,2] >>>> 3. Open bugs with Council participation [3] >>>> 4. Open floor >>> >>> Is there a reason why the request to council to vote on whether EGO_SUM >>> should be reinstated ("un-deprecated") or not, did not make it on the >>> agenda? >>> >> I don't see it in replies to the call for agenda items: > > I am sorry. I was unaware that one could only propose agenda items > between the call for agenda items and the council meeting. > > The mail with the request to council@ was sent on 2023-04-24, after > the last council meeting. I assumed this was enough to get it on the > agenda, especially since I received no feedback otherwise. > > Or maybe did the request fall through the cracks? Such things happen. > > In any case, please consider the request to be added to the council's > agenda. Thanks. :) I gave feedback: https://marc.info/?l=3Dgentoo-dev&m=3D168305630404739&w=3D2 (The pkgcheck thing still hasn't been addressed either.) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iOUEARYKAI0WIQQlpruI3Zt2TGtVQcJzhAn1IN+RkAUCZGAI9V8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MjVB NkJCODhERDlCNzY0QzZCNTU0MUMyNzM4NDA5RjUyMERGOTE5MA8cc2FtQGdlbnRv by5vcmcACgkQc4QJ9SDfkZCNowD/XswxopcVRZSC0Y3D9F66vrcPDA3WTWNqmGy2 +XaY03QA/Aj4aVbrAKRihcQDxeBl7mqcWRCZcO7ijRwF/Yd4xrkB =YMua -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--