public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Maier <tamiko@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Foundation meeting agenda for April 2018
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 20:06:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <876051rxwc.fsf@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180409001118.GA29309@clocktown> (zlg@gentoo.org's message of "Sun, 8 Apr 2018 17:11:19 -0700")

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1131 bytes --]

This is a request by two developers (and not by the council). But I
would like to answer one of your questions.


On Sun, Apr  8, 2018, at 19:11 CDT, zlg <zlg@gentoo.org> wrote:

> [...]
>
> To the Council:
>
> What makes you accountable to this community? Why should we trust or
> respect you when you have nothing on the line except a title? What
> happens next if these affirmations are made? What's your angle, your
> real motivation?

The Gentoo Developer community has used GLEP 39 [1] for its
self-organization for the last 12 years. Our "real motivation" (speaking
as individual developers) is to keep it that way.


> How do you trust a Council member when they have nothing to lose by
> acting against the community?

I fail to see how trying to get an affirmation that the Gentoo
Foundation is still on board with GLEP 39 is "acting against the
community".

We have had a very public case of prometheanfire pushing for dissolving
the current metastructure and reorganizing the community under the
Foundation. Andreas and I, personally, disagree with that.

Best,
Matthias

[1] https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0039.html

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 850 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-09  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-08 20:27 [gentoo-project] Foundation meeting agenda for April 2018 Matthew Thode
2018-04-08 20:43 ` Matthias Maier
2018-04-08 20:48   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2018-04-09  0:11   ` zlg
2018-04-09  0:14     ` Rich Freeman
2018-04-09  1:06     ` Matthias Maier [this message]
2018-04-09  1:38       ` Alec Warner
2018-04-09  4:10         ` William Hubbs
2018-04-09 11:11         ` Luca Barbato
2018-04-09  3:29       ` zlg
2018-04-09  3:42         ` Virgil Dupras
2018-04-09  4:39           ` zlg
2018-04-09  5:47             ` Michał Górny
2018-04-09  6:28               ` Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
2018-04-09 14:12                 ` William Hubbs
2018-04-09  7:17         ` Matthias Maier
2018-04-09  7:50           ` zlg
2018-04-09 12:38         ` Rich Freeman
2018-04-09  8:23     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2018-04-09  9:56       ` Matthew Thode
2018-04-09 11:36         ` Luca Barbato
2018-04-09 15:44           ` Matthew Thode
2018-04-09 12:01     ` Alexis Ballier
2018-04-09  6:12   ` Michał Górny
2018-04-09  4:25 ` Alec Warner
2018-04-09 15:53 ` Matthias Maier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=876051rxwc.fsf@gentoo.org \
    --to=tamiko@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox