From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64789158089 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 19:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9919D2BC0AB; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 19:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82FBE2BC0AB for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 19:33:45 +0000 (UTC) References: <87v8b2zkrs.fsf@gentoo.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 30.0.50 From: Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Sam James Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Reconsidering github "noreply" emails in author/signed-off-by Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:18:17 +0200 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <868r7xm6lo.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 8b91d472-62b0-4916-b30d-b10aa80cefd9 X-Archives-Hash: 97e401cc0cfa116017e55bba70b9c7c7 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Ulrich Mueller writes: > GLEP 76 requires "a known identity as a natural person", which in > particular can be "an established online identity". IMHO this implies > that the person can be contacted by the address given in the sign-off. I agree with this interpretation (and am not in favor of noreply emails given by GitHub). I think a clarification sentence is sufficient next to the 'established identity' rule. Have a lovely night! =2D-=20 Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iOcEARYKAI8WIQT+4rPRE/wAoxYtYGFSwpQwHqLEkwUCZTLWE18UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0RkVF MkIzRDExM0ZDMDBBMzE2MkQ2MDYxNTJDMjk0MzAxRUEyQzQ5MxEcYXJzZW5AZ2Vu dG9vLm9yZwAKCRBSwpQwHqLEk+CyAP0YvHZlEaufhBZOqjlRQlRmTrNOS0QCMVnD zgZV300OnAD/TyIVec9TLIG8D4mEPWT+Y2qr3p3rGDmZAzqbAGmE0g4= =muqN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--