From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 620FC138239 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B95D2E086B; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BC7AE085A; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A51D346ED8; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <865f16d3896a75d4683a4d37a20250876a75e898.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Re: [gentoo-project] Questions for Gentoo Council nominees: Gentoo Foundation - Treasurer Response! From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 14:56:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <86784617.NvtdGxuBOO@pinacolada> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-s3iGEFaHVnuhyVUpNmpY" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 1515b3de-93da-45e8-934b-ffc82ffd2c96 X-Archives-Hash: 1567739dd1c8124678c40094249d8602 --=-s3iGEFaHVnuhyVUpNmpY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2019-07-03 at 06:12 +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 09:34:06PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > > Yes, I understand that. However, I still believe that a contract > > > > initiated between CPA and a single small-ish entity such a Gentoo > > > > involves more costs than fees taken by umbrella dedicated to multip= le > > > > entities. Please correct me if I'm wrong. > > >=20 > > > Nobody knows yet. Different umbrellas work differently. >=20 > The CPA we have engaged so far, Corporate Capital, has a standard > preparation fee of USD1500 per fiscal year. Does this cover everything 'standard', or are there additional potential fees involved? Are you aware if the fee is going to be the same if we go for proper non-profit? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-s3iGEFaHVnuhyVUpNmpY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl0cpfRfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA7Oqwf/Rt99umKioaRrvRq9289ySpe6xvLQdjuz+q3oPIo+TBj5jnaMZFKlFpNJ 40NrX6tJ7+UjI0AvBP8lOI4QRT+rcFAt2AiW0/10KE+/3218Rsj7wFH0t19NDX04 s828+rTySDc37M1vltDg31/iQzKqmTg28ygB5AMytbek8Qbym6u5iB6A3F5kjXb3 r4XjTh0sf5QNEOnQx7IXklGkCn5TJsj7tKRcN1DXDQxhYNhUPtWqoN5NIB0nK3dC B15BfNOqHqb25Vz3EabRsOWdyc+rGa9J+SHXbFJ0QTTKQU9IwnRb6Q5wr+42zc/s Ncd0Wsb37TXhx1zmobAHyp4Gd+QnjA== =6LiD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-s3iGEFaHVnuhyVUpNmpY--