From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39406139085 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 05:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75B422340F5; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 05:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4899D2340F4 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 05:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.0.17] (cpe-72-227-68-175.maine.res.rr.com [72.227.68.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: desultory) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D93F9335DEF for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 05:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] ComRel / disciplinary action reform proposal To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20170115195209.70d3a748.mgorny@gentoo.org> <44e25740-6b88-43b9-e63b-aea93eff5caf@gmail.com> From: Dean Stephens Message-ID: <6e9b63ee-371d-2e4a-dd7a-caeeeff52c7d@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:52 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <44e25740-6b88-43b9-e63b-aea93eff5caf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2bd0cc55-e9aa-4685-8395-6245a9c540ad X-Archives-Hash: 6f3e0090395ed7edbc5f23b30ca95e85 On 01/15/17 16:59, Dale wrote: > > Again, this may not be possible for Gentoo. However, it may give some > out of the Gentoo box thinking. One thing about it, the person may not > even have to appeal what John did. If it is set so that the ComRel lead > or council can see what happened and why, and they disagree, it could be > corrected fairly quickly. It all depends on just how you can set this > up on Gentoo. The private staff area may be bugzilla or something > else. On mailing lists, I'm not sure how this would work unless a email > is sent to the mailing list the person is subscribed to that says member > xyz is restricted. Maybe some automatic method that is scripted or > something. > It is historically significant, in this context, to note that merely reporting a disciplinary action was enough to force the disbanding of the entire Proctors project.