From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CC2A1382C5 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FB49E0901; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33EA3E08F2 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Shutting down the Off the Wall (was: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items ...) To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= References: <2LFZC3RZ.WVSUWEDL.VQXYWEFC@CMM6QA7H.D55IMDXP.EKCHVXDO> <7c937572-53a2-daf7-3760-c807749412e3@gentoo.org> <68ac00f6-afa1-26de-fe63-a6438648b693@gentoo.org> <9c82ba692fb10c5d1a5c847dcfb8974ee9764c0e.camel@gentoo.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ch=c3=ad-Thanh_Christopher_Nguy=e1=bb=85n?= Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <634e372c-1b74-accb-55bc-7f6acdbbeae5@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:24:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.5.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 607c865c-fd5e-4f63-b9f4-1149c2935c39 X-Archives-Hash: cf283783e3cc0c4f7e5d52076c50354a Michał Górny schrieb: >> Ok, so overloading the forum moderation with frivolous requests will >> obviously lead to the legitimate requests getting inadequate >> attention. >> >> I consider those who started digging in historical posts and mass >> reporting >> them as acting in bad faith here. > > Do you consider the one who's overloading everyone with huge volume of > replies with no or almost no actual information in them on the mailing > lists to be acting in good faith? If they have a legitimate point to make, then I consider that in good faith. Continuing past making one's point in order fuel more drama, that would cross the line into bad faith. Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn