From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A07359C91 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 22:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF95DE0853; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 22:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BA85E0851 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 22:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chrome.dite (cpe-74-77-145-97.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.145.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: blueness) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 538DB340BA0; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 22:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2016-02-14 To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= , "Justin Lecher (jlec)" References: <562D4269.1030508@gentoo.org> <56AFB120.3020104@gentoo.org> <20160212232215.65acf1d1.mgorny@gentoo.org> Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, Gentoo Council From: "Anthony G. Basile" Message-ID: <56BE5E0A.4020700@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:34:50 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160212232215.65acf1d1.mgorny@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: ea8aaff5-9567-467e-a8f1-ac5d75cc6f1b X-Archives-Hash: 1267310a1f578d86228c0c10e9d2f5be On 2/12/16 5:22 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Therefore, I would like to ask for Council's help on this issue. I see > the possible following actions that would help the cause: > > a. officially refusing the 'dynamic slot' request [2] so that it would > not be used to block fixing the QA violations indefinitely, > > b. setting an official deadline on fixing the remaining violations > and making the calls fatal. > > [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566518 > [2]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174407 > I was aware of, but haven't really thought through, toolchain.eclass use of use* in global scope. Do you have a solution? I'm okay with putting pressure on developers but if its a technically difficult problem, I'd rather be part of the solution than the problem. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA