From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F7B58973 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8EDF521C084; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B98F021C05C; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jmac.jlec.de (ip-88-153-156-92.hsi04.unitymediagroup.de [88.153.156.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jlec) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 724B5340ED1; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2016-02-14 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <562D4269.1030508@gentoo.org> <56AFB120.3020104@gentoo.org> Cc: Gentoo Development , Gentoo Council From: "Justin Lecher (jlec)" Message-ID: <56B0BAA8.40302@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:18:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="24P7KFnIdt7ug8DnGrvwV5UjGgD1tUhgt" X-Archives-Salt: 6035f43e-e0bd-44c5-9437-e727e8466e56 X-Archives-Hash: ee72c61ae6498f24675236427a522140 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --24P7KFnIdt7ug8DnGrvwV5UjGgD1tUhgt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/02/16 09:06, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Justin Lecher (jlec) = wrote: >> Please reply to this message with any items you would like us to discu= ss >> or vote on. >=20 > Since we were unable to reach consensus so far, I would like to submit > the issue of picking a new XML validation language to the Council. >=20 > Pretty much all the relevant information is in this thread: > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/a1825d5b2a2a16e9e027f6e8= dc6d1fd8 >=20 > If RELAX NG were chosen, I volunteer to convert all the DTDs that are > still relevant. (Hopefully someone else will step forward if XML > Schema is chosen, instead.) >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Dirkjan >=20 Thanks Dirkjan, Could you please sum up the thread and come up with some precise question we should discuss or vote on. Thanks, Justin --24P7KFnIdt7ug8DnGrvwV5UjGgD1tUhgt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWsLqpXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0QUU0N0I4NzFERUI0MTJFN0EyODE0NUFF OTQwMkE3OUIwMzUyOUEyAAoJEOlAKnmwNSmih0QP/1XNVy2MR4RGsRJJOc7GG7+L kek21lKuYSH+IcCEuknnFVAKBL6A+6M9SASZJrt6kjnqN9qSR777wbGDMf21og8M g2swT45nSzYK2tnNSJMpOtYOgP+YOjkh7W4rtshxou6szm0C4Y9VnUzVL0VT0Hjq pgaYXqZM1oK1pmvqdaUpS5g+Zi+SH58CC1sBgg/AwVjggu+9/MW1exfFuFrVTR9P +3/Kf7038UPpHw+IdJrYb3ctiJWLy7HQ4oKuQwHscPuyV5DbY+8mEBJ3IqAK1wM+ NgDr2vkG0kp2mMRTC/U2He2/W3/ZyaUUCXBDY9+pZNb3UylzDnyXlj0HDltfyUda kQbV8HA4mWmpyBJA3HUV07evR+5U2yrmDrU3LPNmtAkBLpBQiGJGEv24UH2mJAP4 m7/GUTtgiZrCGTHmo8/bZX+4P+s36Ei3qt84VXjhAkXSIiit757vsfu/dM0FhzvP rq+cKXW4Dz03W78/Q90/dgO+7Xmt3urq2fH/CFB493RVsYhSHMR3jBPyPy0OJOz6 /XXLJI5QeoeHLS5HUN/Xz+Kk1tD/9U0y6RizOJHh5cEprD9U4lEgTxWO2zTJiz/G 9+0krfrEGwF+a3Mub2eTp6xAeo0hb0Tl+PoPHHGJr6b8hvwSF9gDvRVquQZAZqbf DeRwE0al3CdxS/uPajam =kSwq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --24P7KFnIdt7ug8DnGrvwV5UjGgD1tUhgt--