From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF88B1388C3 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 03:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5CC2E0876; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 03:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82D7DE086E for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 03:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (c-73-53-75-119.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.53.75.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zlg) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 729E7340A6A for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 03:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2016-01-10 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <562D4269.1030508@gentoo.org> <568016EC.6090706@gentoo.org> <22144.10242.162527.187020@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> From: Daniel Campbell Message-ID: <568DD79B.60902@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 19:12:27 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <22144.10242.162527.187020@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c826a0fc-1fda-428f-9fd5-4c72b5e57a99 X-Archives-Hash: c74c1d07d25d69a35fd570fcf48bef4b -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 12/27/2015 10:03 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2015, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > >> the Gentoo Council will meet again on Sunday, January 10 at 19:00 >> UTC in #gentoo-council on FreeNode. > >> Please reply to this message with any items you would like us to >> discuss or vote on. > > I would like the council to vote on banning EAPIs 0 and 3: "EAPIs 0 > and 3 are banned. This ban includes both new ebuilds and updating > the EAPI in existing ebuilds." > > Since EAPI 1 is on its way out of the tree (only 13 ebuilds left as > of today), I think we should also drop the exception which had been > added in the 2014-03-11 meeting: "In case of non-maintainer commits > to fix dependencies, EAPI=0 ebuilds may be updated to EAPI=1 to > keep the changes at a non-intrusive level, as a temporary > workaround." > > Ulrich > Is there a particular reason EAPI 2 is left alone, or has it already been deprecated/banned? I'm generally in favor of lowering the number of EAPIs we need to worry about, especially since iirc EAPI 6 brings a handful of nice things to the table. - -- Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWjdeWAAoJEAEkDpRQOeFw2lEP+wWML6q2vq1S8QEP/z29wBDz Mj5g1TpO8q7dajPfUwy+4Hro0ninxsy/2uFHfCsQlfkhnWmVuiWH1FiLgcdZ13CO 5pLOv+tvbQHi1f2Sy4HncwRs9Nz/PoQcO2FmvEtWOrjycwyof7J05XOp+Q3TtWwk Dd5UHbXUf4vXtHwO8b6KOHu2JPSc/KiwFChYZeVeg2mmIrVhqlqdwXryA1wmIs3H vpFAiAzUfiTxACXSC6LMUqtyOaXQ3UDp0ooO60NU66uwpnCuCWdnGgQIsMEyp376 4+KpujLTf8CNCXccg+n0awRuPEVVw2J+VBs/S+RNYo2755jZtXonrEmVb42itgKO hWY1EAKh19bC3yRfMM204s+YXWQPQnGaD9DE2c+UIOWzJU3QTlgIiAzMW7IbK4AY XttrTl+H0I9FLp5alvkP2gNvP/z8ks4lc5IBaFmlYGG3uSvMR4VYfQ6dZ2Js2Ha4 wNYtdDU/05uFFW+CCn6TUv5bO3Z98/6Mga+je1RmWKRSF9V+pR6MKBvaZQ7lbd9M iYn9k8y5O55k5iiZqm5B05cpF6aXrD2u4dsXFp8RT/kWyUC/7zebyOsfUqYEZ6PS iuC9XtCpNfthWXdlW/XwVSEdCLZDWRUQgHIWpJMOM9r78wfJZj8Yjc8iWOLIrSCH zBd04Wh8bGAmmTrH01d0 =eOdq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----