From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F34613888F for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE8A6E080D; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f176.google.com (mail-yk0-f176.google.com [209.85.160.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311DDE07FB for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykdg206 with SMTP id g206so104670663ykd.1 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:14:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AHePzQlaMYjg2ZckPW5Wz6X54JF2WBEK6WOj7dbcZ5w=; b=XLHADrPFqX4Z204YNgM4O6V1GLjEiM3yEyAhtu96EhfkL1y1AMavW6u9ez2PcFi82P xn/9nayaJWBlxmtc1q0mxZGzgv4wGW+HeCeTouHaYGH6PXdNF7zmaTCx5VDvw1EVotjT O6nniGCn4o6t4cBXS2wa+h6+mHCsTF2FMZtAo0MUbPnTBgZYNqnvVRrJ8j7/Ujaaz29W 7azndcOQDH6uB2wOWOAsAiBB0TfYZnBd0RWFKrvfl57i4Ea7t6HckI7M94EAddEjJG4K QDnlYywzLQGvKjRgxp1yce4XqQOQe3nM76CvSOyTVpjkXfRSHFLHJZr8TytaQZZiq5nf ECtA== X-Received: by 10.129.85.86 with SMTP id j83mr13916528ywb.28.1444497245193; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-120-15.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.120.15]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m127sm5386164ywe.8.2015.10.10.10.14.03 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <1904237.nU16iSOlTl@kailua> <201510100140.57846.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <5618E57A.1000201@gentoo.org> <201510101335.32252.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <5618F874.6000608@gentoo.org> <20151010122111.GG1392@gentoo.org> <56190344.3000108@gentoo.org> From: Dale Message-ID: <5619475B.1020505@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:14:03 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/41.0 SeaMonkey/2.38 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56190344.3000108@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 29165a80-9d48-4340-9756-aa77c5764628 X-Archives-Hash: e6dd763ea6362a321a45b8c9aebd13e3 hasufell wrote: > On 10/10/2015 02:21 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: >> On 10-10-2015 13:37:24 +0200, hasufell wrote: >>> On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >>>> Am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015, 12:16:26 schrieb hasufell: >>>>> On 10/10/2015 01:40 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >>>>>> Am Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015, 14:15:15 schrieb hasufell: >>>>>>> On 10/09/2015 01:56 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: >>>>>>>> Well let's think about this. If github went away, or we needed to part >>>>>>>> ways with github, what we would we want to keep from their site? >>>>>>> It is more likely that our infra servers go down or break than github. >>>>>>> From a reliability standpoint, our infra servers clearly lose. >>>>>> I think you're missing the point here completely. Whatever. >>>>> Not at all, but you'd have to read my whole mail. >>>> The rest is even more irrelevant. >>> Not at all, it discusses solutions to what I and blueness were >>> discussing. If you cannot follow the discussion, why do you respond then? >> Outsider's perspective: you and Anthony/Andreas are discussing completely >> different topics. >> > Thanks for the contribution. Can we get ontopic now instead of > nitpicking on a few single sentences that don't make sense if you didn't > read the whole discussion or didn't try to understand what the author > was getting at? > > Thanks. > > > I been following this too. I think it is you who doesn't get it this time. May want to rethink this. I'm not a developer and I don't even claim to know all the details of the changes being made but even I can follow what Andreas is saying. He's making a point and either you can't see it or just don't want to see it. Dale :-) :-)